Veterans Boycott Invictus Games Over Sussex Controversy

In a surprising turn of events, hundreds of injured veterans are stepping back from the upcoming Invictus Games in protest against the involvement of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

The announcement comes after reports surfaced that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle solicited $55,000 to attend the first day of the event, raising eyebrows and sparking outrage among the veteran community.

On Monday, veterans from various countries and military branches united in a powerful joint statement, declaring their intention to boycott the games set to take place in Vancouver and Worcester, Canada, in September 2025.

Their decision stems from a profound disappointment in how the Sussexes have represented the values and spirit of the Invictus Games, which celebrates the courage of wounded soldiers.

The veterans' statement was clear: they feel that Harry and Meghan have exploited the Games for personal gain.

They accused the couple of using this international sporting event as a platform to further their own agenda, rather than honoring the sacrifices made by the warriors who participate.

This sentiment resonates deeply within the veteran community, which prides itself on resilience and camaraderie.

Moreover, the veterans voiced concerns that the Sussexes' actions have tarnished the reputation of the Invictus Games.

By leveraging their patronage to criticize the royal family and engage with controversial issues, they believe the Sussexes have strayed from the core mission of the Games.

“We are not here to be used as props or pawns,” the veterans stated emphatically, underscoring their commitment to honoring the spirit of competition and support among wounded warriors.

The call to action from the veterans extends beyond their own ranks.

They urge the Invictus Games organizers and Olympic committees to reconsider their relationship with the Sussexes, emphasizing that a significant majority of participants share their sentiments.

The veterans hope to redirect focus towards the true heroes of the Games—the injured service members whose stories of triumph deserve the spotlight.

Their declaration has garnered a mixed response.

While many supporters of the Invictus Games applauded the veterans for taking a stand, others criticized them, accusing them of ingratitude and jealousy.

Some fans of the Sussexes have come to their defense, arguing that the couple's involvement brings much-needed attention to the cause.

This backlash highlights the polarized opinions surrounding the Sussexes and their role in public life.

As of now, Harry and Meghan have remained silent on the matter, but sources close to them report feelings of betrayal and shock over the veterans' decision.

Friends and allies of the couple have expressed frustration, suggesting that the Sussexes only aimed to support the Games and its participants.

They emphasize that Harry's dedication to the Invictus Games is deeply personal, stemming from his own experiences and commitment to helping fellow veterans.

Insiders claim that the Sussexes have no plans to withdraw their support or patronage despite the controversy.

They see the veterans' boycott as a personal affront, perceiving it as punishment for their outspoken views and lifestyle choices.

The couple has reportedly invested both time and resources into the Games, asserting their pride in supporting such an important initiative.

With tensions running high, sources indicate that Harry and Meghan are prepared to take legal action if necessary.

They maintain that their involvement is driven by passion and a desire to uplift the veteran community, not to undermine it.

Supporters of the Sussexes continue to rally around them, emphasizing their contributions to the Invictus Games and their commitment to advocacy.

As the situation unfolds, the future of the Invictus Games remains uncertain.

The veterans' bold stance has ignited a conversation about the intersection of celebrity and charity, raising questions about how best to honor the sacrifices of those who have served.

With both sides standing firm in their beliefs, it's clear that this controversy will continue to resonate within the veteran community and beyond.