Valentino’s Critique of Meghan Markle’s Fashion Choices at Invictus Games

Valentino took a jab at Meghan for flaunting her physique in front of veterans, questioning why she left all buttons open.

The Duchess of Sussex, aged 42, made a bold fashion statement as she graced the Invictus Games in a pricey yet sporty ensemble.

Accompanied by the Duke in Dusseldorf, Meghan has been actively participating in various events at the Games.

Despite jetting out of Los Angeles adorned in over $10,000 worth of designer attire, including a Hermes scarf and now-sold-out Valentino flats, Meghan surprised onlookers by opting for a more affordable $217 Banana Republic shirt dress for her inaugural Invictus event.

Radiating beside Harry in Dusseldorf, she also sported a diamond pinky ring of mysterious origins, reportedly valued at $96,000.

In 2021, the couple refuted claims that the piece was crafted using a stone gifted to them from the Middle East.

Meghan’s strategic utilization of the Invictus platform to enhance her commercial stature through clothing sales has not gone unnoticed.

However, her unconventional outfit choices have left the audience unimpressed.

Refusing to adhere to prescribed sportswear norms, Meghan’s mismatched ensembles garnered mixed reviews.

From excessively short shorts paired with an elegant jacket to swapping sneakers for floor-scratching high heels, Meghan’s fashion risks raised eyebrows.

Delivering a speech to soldiers in a daringly unbuttoned shirt dress, she accentuated her slender legs, drawing both admiration and criticism.

Valentino’s comment on her attire sparked controversy, highlighting the debate over appropriateness in formal settings.

Allegations surfaced that Meghan did her own hair and makeup at a 5-star hotel in Dusseldorf within a brief timeframe, adding intrigue to her behind-the-scenes preparations.

Reports suggested that her goyard tote was a vintage find, triggering backlash over concerns of extravagant displays overshadowing the event’s essence.

Critics voiced disdain over Meghan’s perceived transition from a fashion icon to a thrifty individual seeking markdown deals.

Meghan’s attempt to leverage the Invictus Games for image restoration faced scrutiny, with detractors labeling it as disrespectful.

Emphasizing the need to prioritize honoring veterans over personal agendas, critics denounced her perceived self-promotion amidst past controversies.

The narrative of Meghan’s transformation into a relatable figure clashed with her history of contentious interactions with the royal family, fueling skepticism.

Accusations of sabotaging significant opportunities and exploiting platforms for personal gain tarnished Meghan’s reputation on a grand scale.

Calls for genuine introspection and humility overshadowed her attempts at reinvention during events meant to celebrate resilience and sacrifice.

The lingering shadow of past conflicts and animosity towards the royal family hindered Meghan’s bid for redemption, underscoring the complexities of public perception and accountability.