Troll: Prince Harry Faces Emotional Crisis Over Time Magazine Cover Controversy

Conservative columnist Matt Walsh ignited a firestorm by criticizing the Time magazine cover featuring Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, labeling it as a sad display for the Duke.

Taking to Twitter, Walsh described Harry as the epitome of a modern beta male, crouching behind his wife and appearing neutered.

Democratic Party congressman Ruben Gallego came to Harry's defense, highlighting the Duke's military service, including two tours in Afghanistan, emphasizing his bravery and dismissing the beta male label.

According to a royal expert, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are encountering diminishing support in the US following mixed reactions to their Time magazine cover.

The royal couple's inclusion in the magazine's annual top 100 list of influential people has sparked controversy, with opinions divided both in the UK and the States.

Royal expert Richard Eden noted the polarizing effect the couple seems to have, prompting discussions on whether American coverage of them differs significantly from that in the UK.

The divide in American sentiment towards Harry and Meghan appears to align with political affiliations, as US conservative pundit Candice Owens expressed her disapproval of the couple's portrayal in the media.

Owens criticized what she perceived as the emasculation of Prince Harry, questioning the public display and its impact on his dignity.

The couple's appearance on the Time 100 Most Influential People list generated significant buzz, with some observers initially questioning the authenticity of the accompanying photos.

Richard Eden, a diary editor, shared his initial skepticism regarding the images of the couple, likening them to satire due to their unconventional nature.

Despite the initial doubts, the couple's prominence in global conversations remains undeniable, with their every move scrutinized and dissected by the public.

While some view their actions as strategic and calculated, others perceive them as genuine expressions of their dynamic as a couple.

The scrutiny surrounding Prince Harry intensified when he faced backlash from conservative commentators for his remarks on the US Constitution during a podcast appearance.

His comments on the First Amendment drew criticism from figures such as Senator Ted Cruz and Representative Dan Crenshaw, highlighting the ongoing debate over the Duke's public statements.

As the couple continues to navigate the spotlight, their actions and statements will undoubtedly fuel further discussions and debates on their roles and influence in the public eye.