Connect with us

US News

The Harkles Remove Netflix Mockumentary Amid Lawsuit Drama

Photos: GETTY

The News

The Harkles Remove Netflix Mockumentary Amid Lawsuit Drama

In a surprising turn of events, Megan and Harry, also known as the Harkles, have taken down their six-part Netflix documentary that poked fun at The Curtsy to the Queen from their production company, Archewell.

The removal of the mockumentary raises eyebrows as it seems the couple is attempting to erase any trace of their involvement in the project.

Despite this effort, Archewell Productions is still credited in the documentary, leaving many to wonder about the true intentions behind the deletion.

Interestingly, while the documentary has vanished from the Archewell website, it remains accessible on Spotify under the name “Archetypes.”

This move suggests that Megan may not be as proud of this particular work as previously thought.

The absence of the documentary from the Archewell site contradicts the narrative that the couple has been actively engaged in producing content over the past four years, as claimed on their website.

Speculation has arisen that Megan's actions may be linked to a lawsuit filed by Samantha, her half-sister.

Samantha's lawyer argued that Megan and Harry, as producers of the documentary, bear responsibility for any defamatory statements made within it.

This legal battle has intensified, with experts suggesting that the couple's attempts to remove incriminating evidence may indicate a consciousness of guilt on their part.

Despite efforts to distance themselves from the documentary, it remains available on Netflix, much to the potential delight of onlookers within the streaming platform.

The unfolding drama surrounding the lawsuit has prompted the Harkles and their supporters to engage in a spree of deleting and concealing various materials, raising suspicions about their motives and actions.

Megan's legal team has countered Samantha's claims, arguing that the lawsuit lacks merit and should be dismissed.

Samantha alleges that Megan's statements have tarnished her reputation and led to threats against her life, as well as social ostracization.

She points to discrepancies in Megan's public statements, such as denying knowledge of Samantha during an interview with , despite their shared history.

Samantha vehemently denies participating in any Twitter attacks against Megan, as suggested in the Netflix series, which resulted in her account suspension.

She hopes that the lawsuit will shed light on Megan's alleged attempts to damage her reputation and expose the truth behind their strained relationship.

In response, Megan's legal team maintains that Samantha's grievances stem from a difference in recollection regarding their shared past.

As the legal battle between the estranged sisters unfolds, the public is left to ponder the complexities of family dynamics, personal agendas, and the enduring impact of past relationships.

Samantha Markle's quest for justice underscores the intricate web of emotions and conflicts that can arise within even the closest of kin.

The unfolding saga serves as a reminder that perceptions of the past can vary widely, shaping present-day narratives and legal disputes.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
You may also like...

More in The News

Top stories

To Top