Sussexes’ Charity Stunt: A Tale of Two Approaches

In a recent whirlwind visit to Los Angeles, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle made headlines with their involvement in fire relief efforts.

However, their appearance has sparked a conversation about the essence of charity and how it should be conducted.

While the Sussexes were busy posing for photos, another couple was truly making a difference.

Selena Gomez and her fiancé Benny Blanco were spotted on January 16th, stepping into the chaos created by the L.A. fires.

Instead of seeking the spotlight, they arrived quietly, armed with boxes of food and essential supplies.

Their approach was refreshingly devoid of public relations theatrics.

With their masks on, they got right to work, embodying the spirit of giving back.

Their actions spoke volumes.

Selena and Benny didn't just drop off a few items; they rolled up their sleeves, unpacked food, and contributed a whopping $5 million to aid efforts.

They even rallied other companies to ensure that help kept flowing to those in need.

This was charity in its purest form, driven by genuine concern rather than a desire for attention.

In stark contrast, Harry and Meghan's visit lasted a mere 17 minutes, which many have dubbed a “hug-and-run” charity event.

Their contributions?

A few staged photos, some hugs, and little else.

Did they bring food or supplies?

Not a chance.

Instead, they arrived in a convoy of gas-guzzling SUVs, lifted the lid off a plastic bin, and exchanged pleasantries with those present.

The optics of their visit were certainly appealing to tabloids, who quickly lauded the couple as modern-day saints.

But let's be real—this felt more like a PR stunt than a heartfelt effort to help those affected by the fires.

While Selena and Benny were busy mobilizing resources, Harry and Meghan seemed focused on ensuring their presence was captured on camera.

For context, consider the actions of actor Sean Penn during a hurricane, when he waded through floodwaters to rescue survivors.

No cameras, no entourage—just raw heroism.

This is the kind of selfless action that embodies true charity.

In comparison, Harry and Meghan's two-hour drive to hand out sandwiches, complete with a photographer in tow, seems almost trivial.

Charity isn't about being seen; it's about making a tangible difference in people's lives.

If the Sussexes genuinely wanted to help, they could have brought supplies, made a significant donation, and avoided the media circus altogether.

Yet, their focus appeared to lean more toward public perception than actual impact.