Sarah Vine Criticizes Prince Harry for Seeking UK Taxpayer-Funded Security

Royal turmoil continues as Prince Harry takes legal action against the UK government, demanding the reinstatement of his police bodyguards for the safety of his family upon their return.

In a scathing article titled “Prince Harry, if you still want security for the family, make sure your mates at Netflix pay for it,” royal commentator Sarah Vine lambasts Harry for his perceived entitlement and ingratitude towards the British taxpayers.

Vine's biting commentary highlights Harry's timing in pushing for security measures, suggesting that he is prioritizing his needs over the well-being of the royal family amidst ongoing controversies.

She paints a picture of Harry as a whining and ungrateful individual who has turned his back on his family and country, opting instead for a life of luxury and self-interest in America.

The article delves into the narrative of Harry and Meghan's decision to step back from their royal duties, emphasizing that it was a choice they made willingly, without external pressure.

Vine argues that the couple's grievances and sense of victimhood are unfounded, attributing their troubles to their own attitudes and actions rather than external factors.

Vine criticizes Harry and Meghan for their perceived hypocrisy, citing examples of their lavish lifestyle choices juxtaposed with their public stance on environmental issues and social responsibility.

The couple's perceived abandonment of their royal duties in favor of personal gain and fame is condemned as a betrayal of their roles and obligations.

The article questions the rationale behind Harry's demand for taxpayer-funded security when he and Meghan have distanced themselves from their royal connections and responsibilities.

Vine challenges Harry to seek financial support from his new ventures, such as deals with Netflix, rather than burdening the British public with the cost of their protection.

Vine's scathing critique culminates in a condemnation of Harry's legal actions against the government, particularly during a challenging period for the Queen.

She portrays Harry's decision to pursue legal recourse as a betrayal of familial ties and a display of disrespect towards his grandmother.

In conclusion, Sarah Vine's article serves as a sharp rebuke of Prince Harry's perceived sense of entitlement and detachment from his royal heritage.

The piece underscores the complexities of the royal family's dynamics and the ongoing tensions surrounding Harry and Meghan's decisions, urging them to take responsibility for their choices and actions.