**Royal Succession Bill Amendment Raises Questions About Harry’s Lineage**

An intriguing twist in the royal family saga has emerged as details about an amendment to the succession bill in 2013 have come to light.

The amendment, which raises questions about Prince Harry's lineage and potential claim to the throne, has sparked speculation about the royal family's emergency backup plan to prevent Harry from ever becoming King.

The amendment, made in 2013, includes clauses that could be activated in the event that Harry is not genetically related to his father, Prince Charles.

It states that a person is disqualified from succeeding to the crown if they are not the offspring of both parties to a royal marriage.

This provision, however, can be overridden if both houses of Parliament pass a resolution to that effect.

The intricacies of royal marriages and inheritance laws add further complexity to the situation.

Currently, titles and honors must be born of the body of the wife of the title holder, leading to potential complications for children born through alternative means such as surrogacy.

The case of a regular couple who had a baby via a gestational carrier using the wife's eggs and successfully changed the law to recognize the child as their natural offspring highlights the need for clarity in such matters.

However, when it comes to the royal family, the application of common law may not necessarily apply, raising uncertainties about the rights of children born through unconventional methods.

Speculation abounds regarding whether Meghan Markle and Prince Harry used a surrogate, as they have been notably secretive about their family planning.

The reluctance of Parliament to address the issue directly suggests that the legal status of any potential children born through surrogacy remains uncertain.

Royal insiders suggest that the amendment to the succession bill in 2013 was prompted by doubts surrounding Prince Harry's paternity.

Reports indicate that Prince Charles relied on a DNA test that yielded ambiguous results, leading to concerns among senior members of the royal family.

The implications of this amendment extend to Harry and Meghan's children, Archie and Lilibeth, whose royal titles and succession rights could be called into question if they are not genetically linked to their parents.

The use of a gestational carrier complicates matters further, raising the possibility that the children may be considered adopted rather than legitimate heirs.

Despite the secrecy surrounding the circumstances of Archie and Lilibeth's births, there is a strong argument for allowing them into the line of succession based on genetic ties to Harry and Meghan.

However, the couple's reluctance to disclose details about their children's conception has fueled speculation and raised suspicions about their motives.

The ongoing debate over Harry's lineage and the succession implications for his children underscore the complexities of royal inheritance laws and the challenges of balancing tradition with modern realities.

As the royal family navigates these delicate issues, the future of the monarchy hangs in the balance, with questions about legitimacy and lineage casting a shadow over the House of Windsor.