Royal Photo Controversy: Speculations Surround Archie’s Christening Image

The internet is buzzing with theories surrounding a particular photo from Archie's christening, raising eyebrows and sparking debates on social media.

Many Twitter users are convinced that the image has been significantly altered, leading to a storm of speculation about what's real and what's not.

From Meghan's ring appearing larger than life to oddities involving Kate and Camilla, it seems everyone has an opinion.

Some eagle-eyed observers have pointed out that Kate's chair legs appear to be mysteriously missing in the photo, while others claim Camilla's dress looks suspiciously different.

Doria, Archie's grandmother, also seems to have been cropped out in an unflattering way, leaving some to wonder about the authenticity of the moment captured.

Meanwhile, Kate is described by some as looking flat and mannequin-like, and Prince William's head is said to appear oddly misshapen.

Adding fuel to the fire, some online sleuths argue that William looks disproportionately tall compared to his father, Charles, in this image.

Others have noted that his hair appears thicker and more voluminous than usual, leading to further scrutiny of the photo's integrity.

Some even suggest that little Archie looks pixelated, with expressions that hint at strain or disdain.

Interestingly, a few theorists are convinced that the photo call and the actual christening took place on the same day.

They point to the fact that Harry's suit and Meghan's shoes are identical in both sets of images.

This has led to wild claims that the photo was actually taken on May 8th, 2019, coinciding with the photo call at Windsor.

Fashion choices have also come under the microscope, with observers noting that Catherine and William appeared in different outfits during the official photos.

This discrepancy has fueled suspicions of royal antics, with some suggesting that Archie might have been christened on Princess Diana's birthday, July 1st, or even on Independence Day.

Adding another layer to the story, some sharp-eyed media outlets noticed that a clock in the photos shows a time of 11:54 AM.

The official release of Archie's photos occurred four hours later, which has led to questions about the timeline of events.

While some reports claim William arrived at Windsor Castle around noon, others insist it was in the morning, aligning with the court's announcement that the christening took place at 11 AM.

Skepticism continues to swirl around the presence of Diana's sisters at the event.

Many believe that the entire image featuring them is a product of Photoshop, pointing out that they would never don a fedora hat for such a formal occasion.

Additionally, some commenters have remarked that Catherine appears unusually large in the photo, with her head seemingly twice the size of William's.

In a twist to the ongoing saga, Meghan Kelly, a former Fox News commentator and vocal critic of the Sussexes, has claimed that Harry and Meghan plan to leverage their children's royal titles for financial gain.

Although Archie and Lilibet did not receive HRH status at birth, discussions with King Charles have reportedly led to changes regarding their titles.

In a recent interview, Meghan asserted that the couple's popularity in the U.S. hinges on their children's titles, especially given their declining approval ratings in both the U.S. and the U.K. “Calling your kid prince and princess isn't going to help,” she remarked, criticizing the couple's perceived attempts to remain in the public eye.

As the drama unfolds, many are left wondering how the royal family will respond to these swirling rumors and accusations.