Royal Fashion Face-Off: Meghan Markle vs Kate Middleton

Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton made a stunning appearance at the Commonwealth Day service, showcasing their impeccable style in navy suede heels.

The Duchess of Cambridge and her sister-in-law seemed to be twinning in their footwear choice, with both opting for similar pairs that featured a pointed toe and a sleek design.

However, upon closer inspection, a subtle difference was revealed – Meghan's trademark stiletto heel versus Kate's slightly thicker heel.

Kate Middleton was spotted recycling her beloved Mallory pumps by Rupert's Anderson, a signature pump known for its timeless elegance and versatility.

These classic heels, with a 100mm heel height, had previously been worn by Kate in February 2016 during a church service commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Royal Air Force cadets.

In contrast, Meghan Markle showcased her fashion flair by donning the navy BB pumps by Manolo Blahnik, a chic and sophisticated choice that retails for £450 online.

The former actress, known for her impeccable sense of style, also owns the same pair in black.

The Manolo Blahnik pumps, named after French movie star Brigitte Bardot, feature a thin 100mm heel and a pointed toe, adding a touch of glamour to Meghan's ensemble.

For the occasion at Westminster Abbey, Meghan exuded elegance in a navy dress paired with a £895 white coat by Amanda Wakeley, complemented by a dazzling white hat by Stephen Jones.

The royal duo once again proved their fashion prowess with their sartorial choices.

This isn't the first time Meghan and Kate have showcased a similar taste in fashion.

In a separate development, a pro-monarchy journalist has raised concerns about Omid Scobie, the biographer of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, accusing him of inciting negative sentiment towards Prince William and Kate Middleton.

Richard Eden, a journalist for the Daily Mail, criticized Scobie's recent article on uk.style.yahoo.com, where he questioned the use of public funds for the Cambridges' residence in Kensington Palace.

Responding to the accusations, Omid Scobie defended his article, highlighting the importance of reading the content before forming opinions.

He emphasized the need for factual accuracy in discussions surrounding the royal family, urging for a more informed approach to media commentary.

The controversy surrounding the royal biographer's remarks has sparked debate within royal circles, underscoring the delicate balance between public scrutiny and journalistic integrity.