Royal Family Drama: The Mystery of Archie and Lilibet’s Existence

There's an unsettling cloud hanging over the births of Harry and Meghan's children, Archie and Lilibet.

Reports suggest that no member of the royal family has ever actually met them.

This revelation raises eyebrows and ignites curiosity among royal watchers.

Royal expert Neil Sean has even claimed there's no diary entry or any memory of Queen Elizabeth ever meeting Lilibet, further fueling speculation.

Adding to the intrigue, Diana Epazancora asserts that no royal has laid eyes on either Archie or Lilibet.

It's hard to ignore the implications of these statements.

Tom Bower pointed out that a famous photograph featuring Queen Elizabeth, Prince Philip, Doria, and Harry and Meghan shows everyone gazing at a shawl, with no sign of Archie present.

This begs the question: did Queen Elizabeth ever really meet Archie?

The answer seems to lean toward a resounding no.

The names chosen for the Sussex children have also raised eyebrows.

Some believe that naming a child Archie, especially when it's a name associated with Prince George, feels oddly intentional.

Was this a move designed to provoke Catherine, the Princess of Wales?

After all, George had previously used Archie as a nickname, which was seen as endearing by many, but perhaps not by everyone.

The narrative surrounding Meghan and Harry is complicated by claims of jealousy towards William and Catherine.

Reports suggest that Meghan may have bullied Charlotte in front of adults, indicating a blatant disregard for the impact of her actions.

This dynamic only adds layers to the ongoing saga of the Sussexes and their relationship with the royal family.

Critics argue that naming their daughter Lilibet was a calculated jab at Queen Elizabeth, who had complex feelings about her own family.

The choice to use a name that had significant emotional weight, particularly after the passing of Prince Philip, seems cruel to many observers.

It raises questions about the motivations behind such decisions and what they reveal about Harry and Meghan's intentions.

Moreover, the couple's history of fabricating stories has come into question.

Claims of miscarriages and pregnancies seem to have been woven into their narrative, possibly to elicit sympathy or attention.

The notion that they might have lied about having children is troubling and speaks volumes about their character.

As for the future of Archie and Lilibet within the royal hierarchy, King Charles is still deliberating on whether they will receive HRH titles.

His decision is reportedly contingent on the release of Harry's memoir, *Spare*, set to hit shelves on January 10th.

This timing suggests that the book may contain revelations that could influence the king's choices regarding his grandchildren's titles.

The situation has become even more complex following the death of Queen Elizabeth on September 8th.

With her passing, Archie and Lilibet have moved up in the line of succession—Archie is now sixth and Lilibet seventh.

As grandchildren of the reigning monarch, they are entitled to claim HRH status, which adds another layer to the unfolding drama.

King George V established protocols in 1917 that dictate the titles of royal children and grandchildren.

This means that Archie and Lilibet have an automatic right to be called Prince or Princess.

However, the decision lies with King Charles, who appears to be treading carefully amidst the ongoing tensions between the Sussexes and the rest of the royal family.

As the world awaits the memoir's release, the stakes continue to rise.

The dynamics within the royal family are fraught with tension, and the public is left to speculate on how these developments will play out.

Will King Charles choose to grant HRH titles to his grandchildren, or will he take a stand against the controversies that have surrounded their parents?

In the midst of this royal turmoil, one thing is clear: the saga of Harry and Meghan continues to captivate audiences.

As details unfold, the questions surrounding their children and their place in royal history remain at the forefront of public interest.

The relationship between the Sussexes and the monarchy may never be the same, and the implications of their choices will echo through generations.