**Royal Baby Mystery Unraveled: Claims of Surrogacy Surrounding Meghan Markle’s Pregnancy**

Rumors have swirled for years about the legitimacy of Meghan Markle's pregnancies with Archie and Lilibet, with speculations suggesting she may have used a surrogate instead.

Doubts even arose regarding Archie Mountbatten-Windsor's birth at Portland Hospital in London.

Now, a certified midwife has come forward to cast doubt on Meghan's pregnancy claims.

Speaking on Quora, the midwife, alongside her husband who is an expert in epidural anesthesia, questioned the narrative surrounding Meghan's childbirth experience.

According to the midwife, Meghan was administered pain relief during labor, a claim corroborated by Harry in his book, “Spare.”

Specific details about the drugs used, including an inhalant called Entonox, were disclosed by Harry himself.

The midwife further alleged that Meghan received additional pain and relaxant medication orally or through injections before a doctor administered an epidural, which typically numbs the lower body, including the legs, for hours.

The midwife's skepticism extends to Meghan's reported ability to walk out of the hospital just two hours after giving birth, a feat she deems implausible given the effects of the epidural.

This discrepancy raises questions about the authenticity of Meghan's entire pregnancy journey, as highlighted by numerous critics before her.

The intrigue surrounding Archie's birth began with observations of Meghan's fluctuating baby bump, prompting further scrutiny into the timeline of events.

Notably, Harry's cryptic remarks about witnessing a child's rapid changes within the first two weeks post-birth have left many puzzled.

While some speculate on the possibility of Archie being older than officially stated, such theories clash with the birth certificate confirming his birth on May 6th, followed by his public debut a few days later.

Adding fuel to the fire, Meghan's sister, Samantha Markle, has publicly alleged that Meghan utilized a surrogate for Archie's birth.

Samantha claimed that the surrogate hesitated to relinquish the child, leading Meghan to allegedly carry a doll during public appearances to uphold the facade.

Insisting on the need for proof of delivery from Meghan's womb to justify any royal titles bestowed upon the children, Samantha emphasized her belief that surrogacy was involved in Archie's birth.

Sam's persistent claims, echoed in subsequent tweets, revolve around the absence of DNA evidence linking Harry to Archie and the lack of concrete proof establishing Meghan as the biological mother of Archie and Lilibet.

These assertions, if substantiated, could potentially challenge the eligibility of Meghan and Harry's children for royal titles under British law, despite the couple's prior disinterest in such distinctions.