Royal Baby Controversy: Are Archie and Lily Just Dolls?

In a bizarre twist of events, royal enthusiasts on social media are questioning the authenticity of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children, Archie and Lily.

Some fans have taken to Twitter, suggesting that the couple may be using lifelike dolls instead of real babies for public appearances.

This theory has gained traction after a YouTube video titled “Megan Markle Fake Baby Expose” amassed over 77,000 views, fueling speculation and debate.

The channel Daily Empress presents a case that Archie, often seen in his father's arms, is nothing more than a doll.

In a video lasting just under four minutes, the creator points out that the baby appears eerily lifelike, leading viewers to wonder if the Sussexes are pulling off an elaborate ruse.

The video's premise hinges on a critical observation: during a recent photoshoot, Archie remained completely still in Prince Harry's embrace.

Critics argue that this stillness is a clear indication that something is amiss.

One viewer commented that the baby's lack of movement during such a significant moment is suspicious.

They pointed out that real newborns are typically wriggly and vocal, making Archie's serene demeanor seem unnatural.

This claim has resonated with others who have also scrutinized the footage.

A royal fan weighed in, stating that the baby Harry was holding looked like a doll, especially during a moment when Meghan, dressed in white, turned her back to the camera.

They highlighted how other royal babies, like George, Charlotte, and Louis, were far more animated during their introductions.

In contrast, Archie's introduction felt starkly different—almost unsettling.

Another observer noted the contrasting body language of the parents.

Meghan appeared tense and disconnected, seemingly more focused on her hair than on the baby in Harry's arms.

This perception has sparked further discussion about the couple's comfort level during the public reveal of their firstborn.

Fans have compared the Sussexes' presentation of Archie to the Cambridge family's introductions of their children outside the hospital.

Many remarked on the lively movements of the Cambridge babies, who blinked, yawned, and shifted in their parents' arms.

Viewers noted that the Sussexes' experience lacked this natural dynamism, which raised eyebrows and prompted skepticism.

One commenter even revisited the videos of Kate Middleton and Prince William introducing their children, contrasting it with the Sussexes' debut of Archie.

They found the difference “unsettling,” emphasizing how the Cambridge children exhibited typical newborn behavior, while Archie seemed to defy those expectations.

As the scrutiny continued, some viewers expressed disbelief about the authenticity of the baby presented to the world.

They argued that newborns are inherently active, constantly moving and making sounds, which contradicts the portrayal of Archie during that iconic photo op.

The online discourse intensified, with many echoing sentiments that the baby did not exhibit any signs of life throughout the entire 20-minute interaction.

This led to a consensus among a segment of viewers that the child they witnessed was not a real baby.

Meghan and Harry welcomed Archie on May 6th, 2019, yet Harry's comments during their first post-birth interview have left some questioning whether Archie was actually two weeks old at that time.

This detail has only added fuel to the fire, as fans dissect every word and gesture from the couple.