The News
**Prince Harry’s Use of Royal Title Sparks Controversy**
Royal analyst Kinsey Schofield has raised concerns over Prince Harry's reliance on his Royal title to amplify his voice in public discussions.
Schofield, host of To Die For Daily, highlighted instances where Harry and Meghan have faced criticism for leveraging their affiliation with the Royal family to engage in various conversations.
In a recent interview with Daily Express US, Schofield emphasized the lack of credibility Harry and Meghan possess when delving into certain topics without the backing of their Royal titles.
She pointed out that their status as Royals often overshadows their qualifications, leading to questions about the legitimacy of their involvement in cultural and political matters.
Schofield specifically cited Prince Harry's remarks on the United States First Amendment as “bonkers” and his collaborations with institutions like the Aspen Institute as examples of overstepping boundaries due to his Royal connections.
She questioned Harry's qualifications, noting that he is not a US citizen and suggested that his influence in such discussions may raise trust issues.
While Schofield acknowledged the potential for the Sussexes to use their titles for charitable purposes, she expressed reservations about their attempts to shape laws and societal norms.
She stated that while supporting charitable causes would be acceptable, attempting to alter the cultural and political landscape could be problematic.
The debate surrounding Harry and Meghan's use of their Royal titles comes at a time when the couple has embarked on a new chapter in the US.
Since relocating in 2020, the Sussexes have engaged in discussions critiquing aspects of American society, prompting Schofield to voice concerns about their intentions and influence.
Schofield highlighted the historical context of America's independence from the British monarchy, suggesting that the Sussexes' desire to shape political discourse in the US could be met with skepticism.
She noted that while charity work could enhance their public image, attempting to sway political decisions might be met with resistance.
As Prince Harry and Meghan navigate their roles outside the traditional Royal framework, the scrutiny over their use of titles to influence public discourse continues to intensify.
Schofield's critique underscores the challenges faced by the couple as they seek to carve out a new identity while grappling with the expectations tied to their Royal lineage.
The ongoing discussion around Prince Harry and Meghan's impact on political discussions raises questions about the intersection of royalty and activism.
While some applaud their efforts to address social issues, others caution against the potential pitfalls of wielding Royal influence in unfamiliar territory.