**Prince Harry’s Living Legend Aviation Award Sparks Controversy**

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, is causing a stir in the aviation world as he is set to be honored with the title of a living legend of aviation.

This accolade has raised eyebrows and triggered criticism from top military veterans who view it as nothing more than a publicity stunt.

The decision to place Harry alongside iconic figures like Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong has been met with skepticism and outrage.

While Prince Harry received praise for his service flying an army helicopter in Afghanistan, retired senior officers argue that his royal status played a significant role in securing this prestigious title over numerous other deserving pilots.

The upcoming awards ceremony, where Harry will be officially inducted as a living legend of aviation, is scheduled to take place in Beverly Hills, California, hosted by none other than John Travolta.

In response to the announcement, Lord West, former head of the Royal Navy, expressed his disapproval, stating that labeling Prince Harry as a living legend of aviation is absurd and diminishes the credibility of the award.

He emphasized that Harry's achievements do not warrant such a distinguished recognition, branding the entire affair as a mere spectacle aimed at garnering attention.

Colonel Richard Kemp, a retired military officer, echoed similar sentiments, dismissing the award as a platform for celebrities to boost their egos.

He highlighted the fact that Harry's role as a gunner in an Apache helicopter, while commendable, does not set him apart from the multitude of individuals who have served in the armed forces and performed extraordinary feats deserving of recognition.

The controversy surrounding Prince Harry's aviation award has sparked widespread debate within military circles, with many questioning the validity of his credentials.

An RAF source expressed skepticism over the decision, noting that a significant portion of the public shares the sentiment that Harry is not deserving of such an honor.

The sentiment resonates with those who believe that true greatness should be the cornerstone of such prestigious accolades.

Royal expert Angela Levin raised doubts about Prince Harry's eligibility for the living legend of aviation title, pointing out the limited flying hours he has accumulated during his military service.

She cast doubt on whether Harry's brief stint in Afghanistan qualifies him for such a distinguished honor, hinting at potential motivations behind the award.

As the controversy continues to unfold, with critics labeling the award as a farce and a product of Harry's celebrity status rather than his actual achievements, the debate over the legitimacy of honoring him as a living legend of aviation intensifies.

The divide between those who question the decision and those who defend it underscores the complexity and subjectivity of recognizing individuals in the realm of aviation excellence.

In the midst of the uproar surrounding Prince Harry's impending aviation award, one thing remains clear – the controversy has ignited a passionate discussion about the criteria for honoring individuals in the field of aviation.

The scrutiny and skepticism directed towards Harry's recognition shed light on the intricate dynamics of fame, merit, and public perception within the realm of prestigious accolades.