Prince Harry’s Aviation Award Sparks Controversy

Prince Harry's recent recognition at the 21st Annual Living Legends of Aviation Awards has ignited a firestorm of criticism, particularly from his biographer, Angela Levon.

With a wealth of experience as a journalist for major publications like The Observer and The Daily Mail, Levon is no stranger to the world of high-profile scrutiny.

Her remarks during a recent appearance on GB News have raised eyebrows regarding the legitimacy of Harry's accolade.

Levon did not hold back when she questioned the merit of the award.

She highlighted that Harry had only spent a mere 20 weeks in Afghanistan, suggesting that his role in aviation was more of a passenger than a pilot.

This assertion casts a shadow over the credibility of the honor, leading Levon to speculate that the award might be one of those that require a financial contribution for recognition.

She drew a parallel to the experiences of Meghan Markle, indicating a pattern of awards being handed out based on financial backing rather than true accomplishments.

In her critique, Levon stated, “I believe that this charity is one that you have to pay to get an award, and I think that would be very much taken from what Meghan's done.”

Her comments reflect a growing sentiment that some accolades may be influenced by monetary donations rather than genuine merit or achievement.

In response to Levon's allegations, GB News reached out to Archul, the organization representing the Sussexes.

A spokesperson firmly denied any claims of financial transactions linked to the awards, asserting, “It's categorically untrue that any money changed hands in relation to these awards.”

Despite this denial, the controversy surrounding the Living Legends of Aviation Award continued to gain traction, with many questioning its authenticity.

Further complicating matters, an online petition initiated by LadyCat SSW demanded a reevaluation of Prince Harry's award.

The petition, which garnered attention on social media, argued that the information provided by the non-profit organization was misleading.

LadyCat SSW, who claims lineage to aviation pioneers such as Orville and Wilbur Wright, Amelia Earhart, and Neil Armstrong, expressed that the misrepresentation disrespects those who truly qualify for such honors.

The petition emphasized the need to recognize real heroes based on merit rather than titles or perceived actions.

This call for accountability resonated with many who feel that the award undermines the achievements of those who have genuinely dedicated themselves to aviation.

Adding fuel to the fire, discussions arose around Prince Harry's omission from a newly released book listing the top 200 military alumni from Sandhurst.

Kent Pei's book, “They Also Served,” features notable graduates from the prestigious military academy, and Harry's absence has sparked further debate regarding his recent aviation accolade.

Online reactions have been swift and unforgiving.

Many commenters voiced their disdain, with one remarking, “Shame on you for giving Prince Harry this award.

It's a slap in the face to true pilots who log more hours in a single day than he has in a year.”