Prince Harry Omitted from Prestigious British Army Book Amid Meghan Markle’s Lucrative Move

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are facing criticism from a royal family expert for a significant decision they made after stepping down as senior royals in 2020.

The Duke of Sussex has been notably left out of a prestigious British Army book, a move that has raised eyebrows and sparked discussions within royal circles.

While Prince William contributed the foreword to the book, which highlighted 200 distinguished Sandhurst alumni, Prince Harry's absence has not gone unnoticed despite his service in Afghanistan.

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams shed light on the exclusion of Prince Harry from the historical record of Sandhurst during a segment on GB News.

He pointed out that behaviors such as boasting about personal kill counts could be a contributing factor to the Duke's omission.

Fitzwilliams expressed his belief that Prince Harry may not be surprised by this development, considering the controversies surrounding him and Meghan Markle.

The scrutiny on the Duke and Duchess of Sussex intensified as they were targeted in a joke at the Golden Globes, implying that they were profiting from doing little of substance.

Fitzwilliams questioned the couple's contributions beyond criticizing the royal family, suggesting that they need to address the lack of tangible achievements apart from lucrative ventures.

The expert's remarks underscore the ongoing debate surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan's public image post-royal exit.

Meanwhile, King Charles has faced mounting pressure to revoke the royal titles of Harry and Meghan due to their contentious statements and actions since stepping back from their official duties.

Despite calls for stripping the couple of their status, sources close to the monarch indicate that he is reluctant to take such drastic measures.

Reputation management specialist Eddie Coram James warned against escalating tensions by removing the Sussexes' titles, emphasizing the potential repercussions on the monarchy's image.

Coram James emphasized the importance of Charles maintaining a dignified stance and refraining from engaging in public disputes with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

He cautioned that stripping Harry and Meghan of their royal titles could be perceived as Charles stooping to their level, undermining his efforts to project maturity and composure amidst familial conflicts.

The expert highlighted the risk of further alienating the Sussexes and fueling more negative narratives from their camp.

The prospect of Charles renouncing Harry and Meghan's titles is viewed as a divisive move that could prolong the rift within the royal family.

Coram James warned against the fallout from such a decision, predicting heightened media sensationalism, strained relationships, and increased animosity between the opposing factions.

The expert's analysis underscores the delicate balance that King Charles must navigate to preserve the monarchy's reputation and navigate the complexities of internal discord.

As the saga surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan Markle unfolds, the dynamics of power and perception within the royal household remain in flux.

The repercussions of their actions and the responses from the monarchy reflect a broader narrative of tradition versus modernity, duty versus autonomy.

The evolving narrative underscores the challenges of reconciling personal aspirations with institutional expectations, highlighting the enduring tensions within the British royal family.