**Prince Harry Faces Legal Battle Over Immigration Status and Alleged Drug Use**

A recent development in the ongoing saga surrounding Prince Harry's immigration status and alleged drug use has seen Oversight PR filing a lawsuit against the Duke.

The lawsuit pertains to Harry's utilization of a fake A1 visa subsequent to losing his IPP status.

As per information from Niall Gardner's latest update, a motion has been lodged in DC Federal Court to prompt US Customs and Border Protection and US Citizenship and Immigration Services to expedite their response to a request concerning Prince Harry's immigration status in light of the accusations of drug involvement.

The Department of Homeland Security finds itself embroiled in a legal dispute over Prince Harry's immigration records, with the Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project spearheading the initiative.

The organization aims to ascertain whether the Duke of Sussex received preferential treatment from the US government.

Allegations have surfaced suggesting that Prince Harry acknowledged his extensive drug use in his book “Spare,” thereby raising questions about his eligibility for permanent residency under US immigration laws.

The lawsuit filed by the Oversight Project seeks to unearth records that could shed light on whether Prince Harry was granted special privileges during his immigration process.

Speculations abound regarding the possibility that Prince Harry resorted to using a counterfeit A1 visa to circumvent immigration regulations and relocate to the United States.

Sources suggest that had he entered the country with an A or A1 visa, his drug history might not have been scrutinized as rigorously, potentially granting him immunity from prosecution for illicit activities.

However, the peculiar aspect arises from the revelation that Harry possessed an A1 visa while the Canadian government revoked his IPP status in March 2020 following the implementation of Megxit.

This decision implied that Harry, along with Meghan and Archie, lost their IPP status and, logically, any accompanying A1 diplomatic visa.

Concerns loom over the potential misuse of the A1 visa privileges by Harry, given his history of controversial behavior that could potentially spark diplomatic tensions.

The Heritage Foundation has condemned the Department of Homeland Security's reluctance to address their lawful FOIA request, citing privacy concerns over Prince Harry's drug use despite his public admission in his book.

The Oversight Project emphasizes that the lawsuit is not a personal attack on Prince Harry but rather a quest for transparency regarding the government's handling of a high-profile and unprecedented case that has garnered significant media attention.

Meanwhile, in a separate legal battle, the High Court has heard arguments regarding Prince Harry's claims of phone hacking against the publisher of the Daily Mirror.

Andrew Green KC, representing Mirror Group, contends that Harry has failed to provide substantial evidence to substantiate his allegations of phone hacking.

The lawyer asserts that the majority of the stories in question lack credibility and revolve around trivial matters that the claimants had not even perused at the time of publication.