The News
Prince Harry Faces £750,000 Legal Bill After Withdrawing Libel Case Against Mail on Sunday
Prince Harry has made a significant decision in his ongoing legal battle with Associated Newspapers Ltd (ANL), the publisher of the mail on Sunday.
The Duke of Sussex has withdrawn his libel claim against the company, resulting in a substantial financial consequence.
The move came just hours before a crucial deadline for his legal team to submit a list of pertinent documents for the trial, which revolved around allegations that he misled the public.
In a surprising turn of events, Prince Harry's lawyers informed the High Court at 10 am that he would be discontinuing his case against ANL.
As a result, he now faces the daunting prospect of covering the newspaper's costs amounting to £250,000, in addition to his own legal fees.
This decision has led to a total bill exceeding £750,000 for the 39-year-old royal.
The legal dispute stemmed from a February 2022 article that delved into Harry's challenge against the Home Office regarding changes to his publicly funded security arrangements during visits to the UK.
His legal team argued that the story, which allegedly contradicted his previous public statements about paying for police protection, was riddled with inaccuracies and amounted to libel against the Duke.
While Associated Newspapers defended the article as expressing an honest opinion without causing significant harm to Harry's reputation, the royal vehemently opposed this stance.
Despite his efforts to have the defense dismissed, a High Court judge ruled in December that it could stand, paving the way for the case to proceed to trial.
In a recent ruling, Prince Harry suffered another setback as his bid to have ANL's honest opinion excluded was rejected, resulting in an order to contribute £48,447 towards the publisher's legal expenses.
The contentious article published by the Mail on Sunday and Mail Online shed light on Harry's alleged attempts to conceal his legal battle with the government over security arrangements following his departure from royal duties in 2020.
The crux of the matter lies in the government's assertion that Harry's reduced security was a direct consequence of his decision to step back from his role within the Royal Family.
Officials defended their actions, stating that the Duke was treated fairly and provided with security on a limited basis when visiting the UK.
As the legal saga continues to unfold, Prince Harry's decision to withdraw his libel case against the mail on Sunday has not only exposed him to a hefty financial burden but also reignited debates surrounding his public image and the intricacies of his relationship with the media.
The repercussions of this development are likely to reverberate within royal circles and beyond, underscoring the complexities inherent in navigating fame, privacy, and accountability in the modern era.