**Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Holiday Greeting Sparks Controversy**

A recent holiday greeting from Prince Harry and Meghan Markle has stirred up quite a bit of controversy.

The end-of-year message shared by the Sussexes includes a photo featuring their baby girl, Lilibet, for the first time.

However, upon closer inspection, some eagle-eyed observers have pointed out peculiarities in the image that suggest potential digital manipulation.

The photo in question appears to show baby Lilibet in a somewhat unnatural pose, leading to suspicions that she may have been digitally inserted into the picture.

Observers have noted discrepancies such as a missing finger on one hand and unusually long index finger, as well as awkward positioning of the legs, giving the impression that the baby was not originally part of the scene.

These anomalies have raised questions about the authenticity of the image and the skills of the photographer behind it.

Critics have pointed out anatomical inconsistencies in the depiction of baby Lilibet, suggesting that the image may have been altered or composed using editing software.

Speculations abound regarding the origins of the photo, with some theorizing that it could be a composite created by Meghan Markle herself.

The lack of other photos featuring a similar depiction of Lilibet has only added fuel to the fire, prompting further scrutiny of the image's veracity.

One particular detail that has raised eyebrows is Meghan's hand gesture in the photo, which some have interpreted as an awkward pose for holding a baby.

Observers have also noted discrepancies in Prince Harry's appearance, such as differences in skin tone between his arms and hands, as well as possible alterations to the length of his fingers.

These observations have contributed to the growing skepticism surrounding the authenticity of the holiday greeting photo.

Further analysis of the image has revealed additional inconsistencies, including the proportions of Archie, the Sussexes' older child, who appears disproportionately small compared to baby Lilibet.

Critics have suggested that these discrepancies point to potential digital manipulation or composite editing techniques being used in the creation of the photo.

The overall impression is one of confusion and intrigue, as observers grapple with the implications of a potentially doctored image.

Speculations regarding the motives behind the alleged manipulation of the holiday greeting photo continue to swirl, with some suggesting that Meghan Markle may have attempted to enhance the image using smartphone editing tools.

However, the apparent lack of subtlety in the editing has led many to question the authenticity of the photo, particularly when viewed on larger screens where the alterations become more apparent.

As the controversy surrounding the holiday greeting photo deepens, past instances of photo manipulation involving the Sussexes have come under renewed scrutiny.

A previous image taken by photographer Misan Hariman, depicting Meghan holding Lilibet at a party, has also been called into question for its potential use of composite editing techniques.

The ongoing debate underscores the challenges of navigating the intersection between digital imagery and public perception in the age of social media.

In light of these developments, the focus has shifted to the upcoming second birthday of Meghan and Harry's daughter, Lilibet.

As the family prepares to celebrate this milestone, questions linger about the authenticity of the images shared by the Sussexes and the impact of digital manipulation on public perceptions of their private lives.

Amidst the swirl of controversy, one thing remains clear: the power of imagery to shape narratives and spark debate in the ever-evolving landscape of online media.