Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Children: Royal Titles with a Twist

In a surprising twist to royal protocol, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's children, Archie and Lilibet, have been granted the titles of prince and princess.

However, they are not permitted to use the coveted style of His or Her Royal Highness (HRH).

This development has reportedly left the couple quite upset, as they navigate the complexities of royal life.

The announcement came during the christening of their daughter, Lilibet, where a spokesperson confirmed her title.

“I can confirm that Princess Lilibet Diana was christened on Friday, March 3rd, by the Reverend John Taylor in the Episcopal Diocese of Los Angeles,” the rep stated.

The spokesperson also mentioned that these titles have been a birthright since King Charles ascended to the throne, indicating that this issue has been settled for some time in alignment with Buckingham Palace.

However, not all aspects of royal tradition are being honored.

Raw commentator Neil Sean shared insights with Fox News, clarifying that while Harry and Meghan's children are entitled to the titles of prince and princess, they cannot use the HRH designation.

This restriction is significant, as it represents a critical element of royal protocol.

Sources close to the Sussexes revealed their frustration over King Charles's decision to ban the use of HRH for Archie and Lilibet.

After months of discussions with the palace, the couple was reportedly hopeful for a different outcome.

They expressed concerns about security issues tied to their children's new titles, believing that being styled as prince and princess would afford them certain royal protections.

Insiders disclosed that since the passing of Queen Elizabeth II, Harry and Meghan have been adamant about their children's titles.

Yet, they were left disheartened by the palace's firm stance that while Archie and Lilibet could be addressed as prince and princess, they would not receive the HRH style because they are not working royals.

Traditionally, HRH is reserved for the highest-ranking members of the royal family who actively represent the crown.

For instance, Prince William and Prince Harry, along with their cousins Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, have held the HRH title since birth.

In contrast, Princess Anne's children, Zara Tindall and Peter Phillips, were never styled as HRHs, as their mother opted out of royal titles to allow them a more private upbringing.

The christening experiences of Archie and Lilibet starkly contrast one another.

Young Archie was baptized in a private chapel at Windsor Castle, surrounded by a rich tapestry of royal history.

On the other hand, Lilibet's ceremony took place at her parents' home in California, where she was christened by a Hollywood bishop under the warm Californian sun.

An insider noted that there was insufficient notice for King Charles or Prince William to attend Lilibet's christening.

With both royal figures heavily occupied in the lead-up to the coronation, their schedules were packed months in advance.

It was emphasized that their absence was not due to a lack of desire to attend but rather logistical constraints.

As Harry and Meghan continue to assert their children's royal status, the debate surrounding titles and privileges within the royal family remains a hot topic.

The Sussexes' insistence on their children's titles reflects a broader struggle between tradition and modernity within the monarchy.

This ongoing saga highlights the delicate balance the royal family must maintain between upholding tradition and adapting to contemporary expectations.

As the world watches, the implications of these decisions will undoubtedly resonate beyond the palace walls, shaping the future of the royal family for years to come.