Piers Morgan Slams Prince Harry’s Remembrance Day Tribute as a Tasteless Publicity Stunt

On Sunday, the royal family will honor Britain's fallen soldiers at the Remembrance Sunday service at the Cenotaph.

The Queen's attendance had been uncertain due to recent health concerns, but Buckingham Palace confirmed yesterday that she will participate in this year's wreath-laying service.

Notably absent were Harry and Meghan, who left the royal family earlier in the year.

Prince Harry, a former army member with two tours in Afghanistan, observed Remembrance Sunday in California.

He and Meghan visited the Los Angeles National Cemetery, where they laid flowers on Commonwealth soldiers' graves and placed a wreath at an obelisk.

However, their decision to share images of the visit sparked controversy.

During an episode of ITV's Good Morning Britain, Piers Morgan criticized the couple for what he perceived as a distasteful PR move.

He expressed disdain over Harry and Meghan's choice to invite a photographer to document their tribute at the cemetery.

Morgan accused them of seeking publicity while claiming to value privacy and independence from the press.

Last year, reports surfaced that Prince Harry requested a wreath be laid on his behalf at the London service, a request allegedly denied by Buckingham Palace.

Susanna Reid, Morgan's co-anchor, defended Harry's actions, emphasizing his strong ties to the military after a decade of service.

However, Morgan remained critical, questioning the need for a public display in an American cemetery.

In a separate development, the Court of Appeal heard new evidence regarding the Duchess of Sussex's privacy and copyright claims against the Mail on Sunday.

Former communications secretary Jason Knauf's involvement in providing information for the Finding Freedom biography was disclosed, leading to a public apology from Meghan for misleading the High Court.

Royal expert Camilla Tominey highlighted the revelations from the court proceedings, suggesting that Harry and Meghan's portrayal of being unsupported by the monarchy contradicts the evidence presented.

The disclosures shed light on the level of control the couple maintained and the efforts made by those around them to manage their public image.

The ongoing scrutiny surrounding Harry and Meghan's decisions continues to fuel debate about their interactions with the media and the public.

As the couple navigates their post-royal life, each action is subject to intense scrutiny and interpretation, shaping public perception of their roles and responsibilities.

The intersection of personal privacy, public duty, and media attention remains a complex and evolving narrative for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

In the aftermath of these recent events, the spotlight on Harry and Meghan's actions underscores the challenges of balancing personal convictions with public expectations.

Their choices, whether intentional or inadvertent, continue to provoke discussions about transparency, authenticity, and the boundaries of public life for members of the royal family.

As the saga unfolds, observers are left to ponder the implications of fame, duty, and legacy in the modern era of media scrutiny and public fascination.