The News
Piers Morgan Fires Back at Prince Harry’s Phone Hacking Verdict
Piers Morgan, the former editor of the Daily Mirror from 1995 to 2004, has issued a fiery response to the recent High Court ruling that found Prince Harry was a victim of phone hacking by Mirror Group Newspapers, MGN.
This bombshell revelation has sparked a heated exchange between the journalist and the Duke of Sussex, with Morgan vehemently denying any involvement in the unlawful activities.
The High Court judge, Mr Justice Fancourt, sided with Prince Harry on 15 out of the 33 articles that were contested, linking them to phone hacking or other illicit information gathering methods.
Additionally, the judge acknowledged evidence indicating that Morgan was aware of journalists engaging in phone hacking during his tenure at the helm of the Daily Mirror.
As a result, Prince Harry has been awarded £140,600 in damages as part of the ruling.
Speaking outside his London residence, Morgan addressed the ruling, emphasizing his lack of knowledge regarding the specific article in question.
He adamantly asserted that he had no part in phone hacking activities and expressed willingness to cooperate if called upon as a witness or asked to provide a statement during the legal proceedings.
Morgan further refuted the allegations hurled against him in court, particularly criticizing the testimonies of individuals he deemed untrustworthy.
He singled out Omid Scobie and Alistair Campbell, labeling them as deceitful figures whose credibility is questionable.
The journalist also took aim at Prince Harry, accusing him of hypocrisy for condemning media intrusion while allegedly engaging in similar behavior himself.
In a scathing rebuke, Morgan cast doubt on Prince Harry's integrity, questioning his commitment to truth and accountability.
He lambasted the Duke for publicly disparaging his own family without substantial evidence to back his claims, portraying him as a manipulative figure with ulterior motives aimed at undermining the British monarchy.
In response, Prince Harry issued a personal statement targeting Morgan in light of the court's decision, further escalating the feud between the two prominent figures.
The ongoing clash between the journalist and the royal highlights the deep-seated tensions surrounding issues of privacy, media ethics, and familial loyalty within the public eye.
As the controversy continues to unfold, the rift between Piers Morgan and Prince Harry underscores the complexities of navigating fame, responsibility, and public scrutiny in an era defined by relentless media coverage and shifting societal norms.
The clash of perspectives and narratives between these two prominent personalities serves as a stark reminder of the challenges inherent in balancing personal integrity with public image in the modern age.