No Fake Kids Needed: Palace Removes Archie and Lily’s Bio from Royal Website

Buckingham Palace has recently made significant changes to its official website, focusing on ensuring the accuracy of its royal lineage.

Notably, the mention of Archie and Lily, the children of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry, has been retracted from the website following a series of updates.

This decision comes in the wake of the removal of the HRH title from Prince Harry's page, aligning with the agreement reached in January 2020 when he relinquished his working royal status.

Consequently, Prince Harry is now simply referred to as the Duke of Sussex without the HRH designation.

The alterations to the royal family's website go beyond Prince Harry's title adjustment.

Despite a search for Archie yielding basic information like his name and gender, there is no dedicated page for him, raising questions about the transparency of the children's background.

Similarly, details about Lily are notably absent from the site, sparking discussions and speculations about the circumstances surrounding their birth and existence.

Recent reports suggesting that Archie and Lily faced obstacles in gaining admission to public schools in Montecito have further fueled rumors regarding the legitimacy of their lineage.

The lack of comprehensive information on the website seems to be a deliberate move by Buckingham Palace to deter unwarranted speculation and maintain control over the narrative surrounding the children.

The recent changes on the royal website not only pertain to titles and family members but also introduce a new drop-down menu leading to external sites associated with the Royal Collection Trust, royal charities, and the Duke of Edinburgh's award.

These additions signal the royal family's emphasis on their charitable endeavors and public initiatives, redirecting attention away from personal matters.

While the updates aim to provide accurate and up-to-date information about the royal family's activities and history, they also reflect a strategic effort to safeguard certain aspects of their private life.

With ongoing revisions being made to the website, particularly following the passing of Queen Elizabeth II, outdated content is being rectified to present a precise portrayal of the royal family's engagements and commitments.

The modifications on the website prompt contemplation about the underlying motives behind the changes.

Are these adjustments merely routine updates, or do they signify deeper underlying issues?

Your insights and opinions on the evolving narrative of the royal family are valuable, and we encourage you to share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Stay tuned for more developments in the royal realm as the website continues to evolve to mirror the current state of affairs.