New Protocol Sparks Debate: Meghan Markle Insists on Royal Address at Invictus Games

In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle has made it clear how she wants to be addressed by officials at the Invictus Games.

The new CEO, Scott Moore, revealed that he was instructed to refer to both Meghan and Prince Harry as “Sir” and “Mom.”

This revelation has ignited discussions about the couple's ongoing connection to royal protocols despite stepping back from their royal duties four years ago.

Moore, who is preparing for the 2025 Invictus Games in Whistler, Canada, shared his experience with the Vernon Morningstar.

He mentioned that he needed to familiarize himself with royal etiquette before the couple's visit.

According to him, the guidance he received emphasized using formal titles, which has left many scratching their heads.

Despite having relinquished their royal roles, Harry and Meghan still seem to embrace certain aspects of their former titles.

Moore explained that he confirmed the proper way to address them upon their arrival, highlighting the couple's continued support for the Invictus Games.

However, the insistence on being called “Sir” and “Mom” raises questions regarding their current status and how they wish to be perceived.

Traditionally, members of the royal family are greeted with “Your Royal Highness” followed by “Sir” for men and “Your Royal Highness” followed by “Mom” for women.

However, since Harry and Meghan stepped down as senior royals, they lost the right to be addressed as “Your Royal Highness.”

This makes their request for these formal titles particularly contentious.

Interestingly, this move contrasts sharply with Harry's previous stance.

In 2020, he encouraged delegates at a tourism conference in Edinburgh to simply call him “Harry.”

This inconsistency has led to criticism, with some questioning why the couple now seeks to maintain a semblance of royal hierarchy when they have previously sought to distance themselves from it.

Critics have voiced their discontent over this latest demand.

One commentator on social media remarked on the hypocrisy of Meghan wanting to be called “Mom,” while previously advocating for a more casual approach.

Another pointed out that Harry and Meghan appear to thrive on their perceived importance, often reminding the public of their royal status even as they portray themselves as victims of circumstance.

The situation has sparked conversations about the Invictus Committee's future relationship with the couple.

Some argue that if Harry cannot see himself as equal to the veterans and participants of the Games, perhaps it's time for the committee to reconsider their association with him.

This sentiment underscores a growing frustration with the couple's apparent desire to maintain royal trappings while simultaneously rejecting the responsibilities that come with them.

Moreover, there's a sense that the couple's recent actions mirror those of past royals who sought to navigate the complexities of public life.

Critics draw parallels between Harry and Meghan and historical figures like Wallace and Edward, suggesting that their attempts to carve out a niche for themselves may ultimately lead to a similar fate—one marked by public scrutiny and diminished relevance.

The insistence on royal titles, coupled with their high-profile lifestyle, has led to a perception that they relish in their royal connections while simultaneously distancing themselves from the royal family.

This duality has not gone unnoticed by the public or brands, many of whom seem hesitant to engage with the couple, reflecting a broader sentiment of disillusionment.

As the Invictus Games approach, the spotlight will undoubtedly remain on Harry and Meghan.