Megyn Kelly’s Scathing Take on Meghan Markle Goes Viral

In a recent viral clip, Megyn Kelly has unleashed a blistering critique of Meghan Markle, igniting discussions across social media.

The commentary, shared by a Twitter user known as Laird of the Manor, highlights Kelly's sharp observations about both Markle and Kim Kardashian.

While acknowledging Kardashian's success as a business mogul, Kelly draws a stark contrast with Markle, whom she openly disdains.

During an NFL game, Kardashian faced a chorus of boos from the crowd, a moment Kelly seized upon to illustrate a broader societal fatigue with what she describes as “narcissistic, self-promotional” figures.

As she critiques Kardashian, it becomes clear that Kelly is also indirectly targeting Markle, suggesting that both women embody a troubling trend in celebrity culture.

Kelly argues that the public's disdain for such personalities is rooted in a longing for the values once epitomized by the British monarchy, especially following the passing of Queen Elizabeth II.

The contrast between the royal family's traditional values and the modern obsession with wealth and fame seems to fuel Kelly's criticism of Markle, whom she accuses of attempting to position herself as a “false god” in the eyes of her followers.

The former Fox News anchor goes on to assert that Markle's efforts to flaunt her wealth and lifestyle are failing miserably.

Kelly believes that Markle is trying to present herself as aspirational, yet her attempts come off as shallow and materialistic.

This sentiment resonates with many who have grown weary of celebrity culture that prioritizes appearances over substance.

But the critique doesn't stop with Kelly.

Her husband, Doug Brunt, also weighed in during a podcast discussion, where he labeled Markle as one of the world's biggest hypocrites.

Alongside other notable figures, he placed Markle at the top of his list, citing her contradictory behavior regarding her ties to the royal family.

Brunt pointedly remarks on Markle's public denunciations of the royal family, accusing them of being racist and cold while simultaneously leveraging the titles bestowed upon her for personal gain.

This hypocrisy, he suggests, is glaring and undermines her credibility.

Reflecting on personal experiences, Brunt shares how he understands the desire to sever ties with a family one perceives as toxic.

He contrasts this with Markle's continued use of the royal title, questioning her sincerity in claiming to have distanced herself from the monarchy.

For Brunt, if someone truly detests their past, they would fully renounce any association with it.

The Sandringham Agreement, which reportedly governs the use of royal titles, is brought into the conversation as Brunt highlights Markle's commercial ventures that still incorporate her royal designation.

This, he argues, is a blatant violation of the agreement and further exemplifies her hypocrisy.

Kelly's commentary and Brunt's insights together paint a picture of a woman caught between her past and her present.

They suggest that Markle's attempts to redefine herself are undermined by her actions, which seem to contradict her words.

As the discourse around Markle intensifies, it's clear that public opinion remains divided.

Some continue to support her, while others echo Kelly and Brunt's sentiments, viewing her as emblematic of a troubling trend in contemporary celebrity culture.

This latest episode serves as a reminder of the intense scrutiny that public figures face, particularly those who navigate the complex waters of fame and family legacy.

Whether this criticism will spark a change in how Markle presents herself remains to be seen, but for now, it has certainly added fuel to the ongoing conversation surrounding her persona.