Meghan’s Miscarriage: A Tale of Three Stories and Growing Skepticism

The narrative surrounding Meghan Markle's miscarriage has taken on a life of its own, presenting three distinct versions that have left many questioning the truth.

The first account originates from Meghan herself, who shared her experience in a heartfelt New York Times op-ed titled “The Losses We Share.”

This piece resonated with many, shedding light on the emotional turmoil she faced.

However, as more details emerged, the story began to fracture into different interpretations.

The second version comes courtesy of Abigail Spencer, a close friend of Meghan's, who recounted her perspective during a Netflix documentary.

In this retelling, the details differ significantly, raising eyebrows and prompting discussions about the accuracy of these personal accounts.

Meanwhile, the third narrative emerges from Prince Harry's memoir, “Spare,” where he recalls a harrowing experience of loss that highlights the couple's emotional struggle.

All three stories converge on the moment of Meghan's collapse, painting a vivid picture of despair.

Notably, two of the accounts mention that she was holding their son Archie at the time, while the third version omits any reference to him.

This inconsistency has fueled speculation and skepticism among royal watchers and fans alike.

In “Spare,” Harry provides a poignant description of the aftermath of their loss.

He recalls the moment a doctor entered the room, stating, “I didn't hear one word she said.

I just watched her face, her body language.” This powerful imagery captures the overwhelming sense of helplessness they both felt, as tears were shed for their unborn child.

The emotional weight of the moment is palpable, especially when Harry describes the burial of their baby in a secret location known only to them.

However, the narrative takes a controversial turn when Harry reveals that they buried their child beneath a banyan tree, a detail that has sparked significant debate.

Critics have pointed out that banyan trees do not grow in California, where the couple resides, casting doubt on the authenticity of this account.

Furthermore, questions arise about the practicality of burying anything by hand, leading some to wonder if the entire story might be embellished or even fabricated.

Skepticism surrounding the miscarriage narrative has reached a fever pitch, with many royal fans openly questioning whether the event ever truly occurred.

Some argue that if the miscarriage had indeed happened, Harry would have shared a more relatable, straightforward story—much like countless others who have experienced similar losses.

Instead, the elaborate details seem to raise more doubts than they resolve.

Adding to the intrigue is speculation that elements of Harry's story may have been lifted from literary works, particularly those by Indian author R.K. Narayan.

One Reddit user noted that the phrase about burying their child under a banyan tree felt oddly familiar, suggesting it might be a direct reference to a specific title from Narayan's collection.

The connection raises questions about the originality of Harry's narrative and whether it borrows from established literature.

The conversation surrounding this alleged literary borrowing has taken on a life of its own, with some even suggesting that Meghan's educational background may have influenced her exposure to such texts.

As a Northwestern University alumna, she may have encountered diverse literary works that could inform her understanding of storytelling.

This possibility adds another layer to the ongoing scrutiny of their accounts.

Moreover, the thematic resonance of the banyan tree in Narayan's work cannot be overlooked.

The concluding story, aptly titled “Under the Banyan Tree,” tells of a storyteller who chooses silence over continued narration.

This narrative twist feels eerily prophetic, as it prompts reflection on the nature of storytelling itself and the responsibilities that come with it.