Meghan’s Columbia Tour: A Royal Faux Pas or Just Protocol?

During a recent tour in Colombia, Meghan Markle reportedly lost her cool, insisting that staff and organizers refer to her exclusively as “Madam.”

This demand has raised eyebrows and ignited discussions about the nature of her public persona.

According to royal expert Neil Sean, this insistence on strict protocol might appear excessive to many, but it highlights a performative side of the Sussexes' public life.

Critics are quick to point out that Meghan's behavior seems at odds with the image of humility and compassion she and Prince Harry have worked hard to cultivate.

One royal commentator, who wished to remain anonymous, noted that this incident starkly contrasts with Meghan's supposed commitment to empowerment and equality.

The tour was meant to shine a light on various charitable causes, yet it has become overshadowed by Meghan's diva-like demands.

This isn't the first time Meghan has been accused of having an entitled attitude.

In previous reports, there have been instances where she clashed with palace staff over seemingly trivial matters, including her specific preferences for avocado toast.

Such incidents only serve to bolster the perception that Meghan is more invested in maintaining a polished image than in the genuine substance of her charitable endeavors.

A former palace insider shared their disappointment, stating that Meghan possesses the potential to be a significant force for good.

However, her apparent need for constant validation and deference seems to hinder her ability to fulfill that potential.

It's disheartening, they added, to see someone with such promise get caught up in the trappings of royal life rather than focusing on the impact she could make.

The uproar surrounding Meghan's conduct during the Colombia tour has reignited the ongoing conversation about the relevance of the royal family in today's society.

Many argue that the Sussexes' insistence on adhering to strict protocols and titles clashes with the public's desire for a more relatable monarchy.

“People want to see royals who connect with the community, not ones who are always demanding special treatment,” remarked one royal observer, who also chose to remain anonymous.

On the flip side, supporters of the Sussexes defend the importance of maintaining royal traditions.

A spokesperson, who declined to be named, argued that these customs are centuries old and serve a vital purpose.

They emphasized that Meghan's insistence on protocol is not about ego; rather, it's about respecting the institution and the role of the royal family.

Despite the differing opinions, this latest incident has further chipped away at the public's trust in Meghan and Prince Harry.

The couple has long portrayed themselves as advocates for social justice and equality, yet they now find themselves mired in a controversy that seems to contradict those very principles.

As the narrative shifts from their charitable efforts to Meghan's demands, the impact on their public image could be significant.

The initial goal of the tour—to promote important causes—has taken a backseat to discussions about entitlement and decorum.