**Meghan Markle’s WME Representation Sparks Controversy**

Meghan Markle recently made headlines after signing with WME for representation.

The agency will now handle Archwell, the content creation label owned by her and Prince Harry.

While the focus will be on film and television production, as well as brand partnerships and business development, acting is not on the agenda.

However, not everyone at WME is thrilled about Meghan joining the roster.

Reports suggest that the agency's CEO faced backlash from employees due to Meghan's past behavior, which was deemed diva-like.

Despite the discontent among staff, the decision ultimately lies with the boss.

During Meghan's initial meeting at the agency, staff members were instructed to address her by her royal titles – the Duchess of Sussex or Her Royal Highness – rather than using her first name.

This directive did not sit well with many, particularly Americans who typically do not use titles.

The situation led to tensions, with Meghan reportedly expressing her displeasure in no uncertain terms.

According to sources, the strict protocol enforced by Meghan has only fueled animosity towards her among WME staff.

Despite their reservations, employees are expected to maintain a facade of respect while dealing with her, even resorting to using derogatory nicknames behind her back.

Meanwhile, actress Jamie Lee Curtis, set to receive an Oscars award in 2023, took a swipe at Meghan for leveraging her royal title for personal gain without fulfilling the associated responsibilities.

Curtis, known for her roles in popular films and TV shows, is married to Christopher Guest, the fifth Baron Hayden Guest.

While she holds the title of Baroness Hayden Guest, Curtis opts not to use it in the United States.

In contrast, Prince Harry and Meghan have retained their royal titles despite distancing themselves from the royal family, criticizing its toxic nature.

This inconsistency has drawn criticism, with commentators questioning the couple's sincerity in their public statements versus their actions in the business sphere.

Royal commentator Daniela Elsa highlighted a recurring pattern in Harry and Meghan's behavior, noting their vocal criticisms of the royal institution followed by lucrative business deals and continued use of their titles.

The juxtaposition between their scathing remarks about the palace and their strategic use of titles for financial gain has raised eyebrows and fueled ongoing debates about their motives and authenticity.