Meghan Markle’s Political Aspirations: A Royal Dilemma?

In recent discussions, many political analysts are raising eyebrows at the prospect of Meghan Markle, the former basic cable actress, potentially eyeing a role in public office.

The mere thought of a former briefcase carrier stepping into a position of power has sent shivers down the spines of some observers.

Royal expert Richard Palmer is among those urging caution for both Markle and her husband, Prince Harry, as they navigate their expectations regarding involvement in U.S. politics.

Palmer suggests that it might be wise for the couple to reconsider their Duke and Duchess titles, although he acknowledges that this is a separate issue.

During a segment on Royal Roundup, he expressed skepticism about Markle leveraging her royal title in the forthcoming U.S. midterm elections.

He characterized the situation as a “slightly dangerous game,” albeit less perilous than it was during Donald Trump's presidency, when the UK was grappling with the complexities of negotiating a post-Brexit trade deal with the U.S.

Reflecting on the past, Palmer pointed out the significant concerns at Buckingham Palace when Markle engaged in voter registration campaigns, which were perceived as leaning towards the Democratic side.

While Markle has never explicitly stated her voting preference, her activism raised eyebrows and created tension, especially considering her status as a member of the royal family.

Palmer emphasized that when Markle and Harry stepped back from royal duties, they did so voluntarily, pledging to uphold the values of the late Queen Elizabeth II.

With Charles now reigning, he suggested that the actions of the Sussexes could be viewed as undermining the monarchy's dignity on foreign soil.

While he believes the current political climate—under a democratic president—lessens the immediate diplomatic fallout, he warns that the territory remains precarious.

Public sentiment appears mixed regarding Markle's potential political ambitions.

Some royal enthusiasts argue that the couple has not only embarrassed the UK but have also tarnished its reputation with their outspoken remarks.

Meanwhile, social media has erupted with mockery following suggestions that Markle might run in the 2024 presidential elections.

Polls indicate that nearly two-thirds of Democratic voters favor a female candidate for the presidency.

Interestingly, more than a quarter of 1,500 surveyed potential voters indicated that they would support Markle over current Vice President Kamala Harris.

This surprising statistic has ignited conversations about Markle's viability as a candidate.

Amidst these developments, it was announced that the Sussexes would receive an award from the Robert F. Kennedy Foundation, an organization dedicated to human rights advocacy.

The news prompted a flurry of reactions online, including one user who shared a t-shirt emblazoned with “Meghan 2024.”

This sparked further ridicule, with another commenter quipping that if Markle is taken seriously as a candidate, it signals troubling times ahead for America.

Charles Moore, a columnist for the Telegraph, weighed in on the matter, suggesting that the royal family would not endorse Markle's political aspirations.

He indicated that using the HRH title while pursuing a political career would be unacceptable in the U.S.

The notion of having “HRH President Meghan” or “First Gentleman Harry” seemed far-fetched to him, raising questions about the appropriateness of such titles in the political arena.

Moore has previously cautioned that Markle may be setting herself up for disappointment by attempting to wield her royal title in America.

The complexities surrounding her identity and status could lead to significant challenges if she chooses to enter the political fray.