Meghan Markle’s Misleading Claims About Archie’s Title Unveiled

Meghan Markle's recent admission through her spokesperson has shed light on her misguided belief regarding her son Archie's title.

The controversy stems from Meghan's previous statements, particularly during the explosive Oprah interview in March, where she implied that Archie was not granted the title of Prince due to concerns over his skin color.

However, a new documentary, Discovery Plus' Harry and Meghan, has brought forth a different perspective.

According to the couple's London-based biographer, Meghan's assertions were based on a misunderstanding of royal protocol.

Contrary to her claims, the decision regarding Archie's title is dictated by official protocol, irrespective of one's skin tone.

The biographer emphasized that Meghan and Harry should have been aware of this fact, and their misleading statements were aimed at tarnishing the royal family's reputation and garnering unwarranted sympathy for themselves.

The biographer further criticized Meghan and Harry for disseminating falsehoods during the Oprah interview, which has since been debunked.

The couple's attempt to inject allegations of racism into the narrative was deemed deceitful and manipulative.

Their actions have not only misled the public but also compelled prominent figures like the Archbishop of Canterbury to refute their claims.

The unraveling of their fabrications has exposed a pattern of dishonesty, with Meghan being singled out for her blatant lies and calculated attempts to exploit racial tensions for personal gain.

The biographer called for a public apology from Meghan to rectify the harm caused by her deceitful narrative.

Moreover, the documentary highlighted the complicity of individuals like Omid Scobie and Oprah Winfrey in perpetuating Meghan's falsehoods.

Despite mounting evidence discrediting Meghan's claims, Scobie and Winfrey continue to lend credibility to her narrative, perpetuating a cycle of misinformation.

Critics have labeled Meghan as a delusional narcissist, whose relentless pursuit of relevance has led her to fabricate stories and manipulate public perception.

The media's continued coverage of Meghan and Harry's exploits has been criticized as fueling their unwarranted publicity, detracting from more pressing issues.

In a separate revelation, concerns were raised regarding Harry's failure to meet Meghan's father before their wedding, prompting speculation about underlying motives.

The absence of a meeting between Harry and Meghan's father raised suspicions about Meghan's intentions, with suggestions that she may have misrepresented her relationship with her father to expedite his exclusion from her life.

The decision to have Prince Charles walk Meghan down the aisle instead of her father was viewed as a strategic move to reinforce Meghan's narrative of familial estrangement.

Critics have condemned Meghan's actions as callous and self-serving, highlighting her willingness to manipulate relationships for personal gain.

As the fallout from the Oprah interview continues to unfold, public sentiment towards Meghan and Harry has shifted, with growing skepticism and scrutiny surrounding their narratives.

The exposure of their deceitful tactics and manipulation tactics has eroded their credibility, leading to widespread condemnation.

The public outcry against Meghan's dishonesty underscores a broader disillusionment with the couple's behavior and their attempts to exploit their royal ties for personal gain.

In light of these revelations, the public discourse has shifted towards holding Meghan and Harry accountable for their actions and demanding transparency and integrity from public figures.