**Meghan Markle’s Financial Past Unveiled: The Truth Behind the Royalties**

In a recent Reddit thread, discussions about Meghan Markle's past work experiences, particularly on the show Suits, have sparked controversy.

Some users labeled Meghan as a covert narcissist, suggesting that her public persona differs greatly from her private behavior.

Allegations of being a “sugar baby” at Fitzpatrick's, made by Gina Torres and Liam Neeson, have further fueled speculations about Meghan's connections with older, wealthy individuals.

Despite denials from Liam Neeson in a subsequent interview, photos of him and Meghan together at Fitzpatrick's have raised eyebrows.

The concept of a sugar baby, typically a younger individual receiving financial support from an older partner, has been linked to Meghan's alleged interactions with Jon, the owner of Fitzpatrick's.

Gina Torres has shed light on Meghan's public display of her relationship with Jon, hinting at a level of discomfort among those witnessing their interactions.

Furthermore, claims of Meghan's deceit regarding her earnings from Suits have come to light.

Reports suggest that Meghan earned $50,000 per episode and continues to receive royalties, contributing to her and Harry's new home in California.

Contrary to popular belief, the notion that Meghan's royalties from Suits significantly fund her lifestyle has been debunked.

Industry experts argue that royalties typically amount to around 6% for TV actors, which may not suffice for covering substantial expenses like purchasing a home.

Drawing a comparison to Jennifer Aniston's earnings from Friends, where she received a substantial royalty percentage due to the show's immense success, highlights the disparity in Meghan's potential earnings.

Addressing misconceptions about Meghan's financial status, it is unlikely that her royalties alone cover the expenses associated with her residence in Montecito.

Speculations about a substantial sum in her bank account prior to meeting Harry have been refuted, suggesting a more modest estimate of her pre-Harry wealth.

With limited intellectual property rights from her work on Suits, Meghan's financial contributions to the Montecito mansion are likely more modest than previously assumed.

Overall, the revelations surrounding Meghan Markle's financial history shed light on the complexities of celebrity earnings and the discrepancies between public perception and reality.

Despite rumors of substantial royalties from her acting career, the truth behind Meghan's financial situation paints a more nuanced picture of her financial independence and lifestyle choices.