Meghan Markle’s Emerald Obsession: A Royal Dilemma

Speculation surrounding Meghan Markle's jewelry choices before her wedding to Prince Harry has resurfaced, igniting discussions about her taste and the royal protocols she faced.

Rumors have long suggested that Meghan had her heart set on a stunning emerald tiara to complement her bridal look.

However, it seems that her aspirations were thwarted when Her Majesty the Queen stepped in, insisting that Meghan wear a different tiara of her choosing.

Interestingly, whispers in royal circles hint that the tiara Meghan coveted might have been the one Princess Eugenie wore on her own wedding day.

Some sources even suggest that Meghan envisioned a crown—typically donned by the Queen herself—rather than a traditional tiara.

This clash of desires underscores the complexities of navigating royal expectations, especially for someone stepping into the monarchy from outside its ranks.

Fast forward to present-day events, and Meghan's penchant for high-end fashion remains ever apparent.

At a recent Indianapolis event, her outfit was nothing short of extravagant, featuring an Armani dress and Manolo Blahnik shoes, along with several new jewelry pieces.

Among these was the “Baby Queen” necklace, part of a collection inspired by the Queen herself, which boasts a hefty price tag and is adorned with emeralds.

The designer, based in Los Angeles, touts ethical practices and highlights the symbolism behind their creations.

However, wearing such an expensive piece isn't merely a fashion statement; it's laden with meaning.

By choosing to don the emerald necklace, Meghan sends a message—one that goes beyond mere aesthetics.

This choice is particularly poignant as the press previously linked the emerald to her son Archie, claiming it symbolizes his birthstone.

Wearing it close to her heart could be seen as a way for Meghan to carry a piece of her son with her, wherever she goes.

Yet, not everyone is convinced of the necklace's significance.

Social media users have voiced their skepticism, with one commenter, a self-identified geology minor, dismissing the idea that emeralds possess any mystical properties.

They argue that gemstones shouldn't be viewed as substitutes for hard work or self-improvement, pointing out that most natural emeralds are riddled with flaws and should simply be appreciated for their beauty.

This backlash raises questions about Meghan's affinity for emeralds, especially considering they may not even suit her style.

Critics wonder why she continues to gravitate towards such choices, suggesting that her background may play a role.

Despite her education, it appears she struggles with accepting “no” as an answer, a sentiment allegedly echoed by Harry when discussing the tiara situation.

Moreover, there's a narrative that Meghan's dissatisfaction extends to other royal heirlooms.

Reports indicate she was upset that a choker worn by Princess Diana couldn't be transformed into an engagement ring.

Allegedly, Harry's decision to give up the iconic sapphire ring further fueled her disappointment, leading her to redesign her engagement ring to mirror the one given to her by her first husband.

Adding to the intrigue, the emerald choker Diana wore—often styled as a headband—wasn't actually owned by her but belonged to the Queen.

Meghan's misunderstanding of this detail highlights the challenges she faces in adapting to royal customs and history.

It seems she assumed that Harry would fulfill her wishes without fully grasping the nuances of royal propriety.

Despite her attempts to embrace emeralds, many question their suitability for Meghan.

Critics argue that green hues don't complement her complexion, raising eyebrows about her fashion choices.

While she may assert otherwise, her track record with green clothing suggests otherwise.

In a world where every outfit is scrutinized, Meghan's jewelry choices continue to spark debate.