Meghan Markle’s Deal or No Deal Dilemma: A Game Show That Changed Everything

In the realm of celebrity, few stories are as captivating as that of Meghan Markle.

Her journey from a briefcase girl on the game show Deal or No Deal to a royal figure has sparked much discussion.

Recently, her former co-worker Lisa Gleave weighed in on Markle's controversial comments regarding her time on the show, igniting a debate about objectification and opportunity.

Speaking to Mail Plus, Gleave expressed her discontent with Markle's portrayal of her experience.

Markle had previously described feeling like a “bimbo” during her stint on the show, but Gleave found those remarks to be quite insulting.

She emphasized that Markle's feelings might stem from her own perceptions rather than the reality of how she was treated on set.

Gleave pointedly remarked, “If Meghan didn't want to be judged on her looks, she shouldn't have applied to go on the show.”

Her perspective highlights the nature of Deal or No Deal, which was fundamentally about beauty and glamour.

Gleave herself never felt objectified, indicating a stark contrast between her experience and Markle's reflections.

Delving deeper into the conversation, Gleave suggested that Markle's role on Deal or No Deal was pivotal in shaping her career.

“She was a struggling actress,” Gleave noted, implying that without the exposure and income from the game show, Markle might not have achieved the level of success she enjoys today.

It's a sentiment echoed by many who believe that the show served as a crucial stepping stone for her future roles, including her breakout part on Suits.

Commentary from other media figures adds another layer to this discussion.

Vinay Menon, writing for the Toronto Star, criticized Markle for her current stance, suggesting that she is now “dangerously annoying.” He pointed out that nobody forced her to audition for the role, implying that she should take responsibility for her choices instead of revising her past narrative.

Menon also highlighted the financial benefits that came with Markle's position on the show.

With a steady income, union benefits, and increased visibility, her role was more than just a gig; it was a launchpad for her future endeavors.

Without Deal or No Deal, he mused, Markle might have found herself in a very different life, possibly far removed from Hollywood and royalty.

The backlash against Markle's comments isn't limited to Gleave and Menon.

Other former briefcase girls, including Claudia Jordan, Patricia Cara, and Donna Feldman, have publicly stated they never felt objectified during their time on the show.

Their experiences suggest a broader narrative that contradicts Markle's portrayal, emphasizing the diversity of perspectives among those who shared the stage.

This ongoing dialogue raises questions about how we perceive roles that are often labeled as superficial.

While Markle seeks to advocate for feminist empowerment, her reflections on her past may come off as an attempt to distance herself from a chapter that undeniably contributed to her success.

Critics argue that instead of lamenting her past, Markle should embrace it as a vital part of her journey.

The opportunities she gained through Deal or No Deal ultimately paved the way for her ascent in the entertainment industry and her eventual marriage to Prince Harry.

As the conversation continues, it's clear that the legacy of Deal or No Deal is complex.

For some, it's a reminder of the challenges faced by women in the entertainment world.

For others, it's a testament to the power of seizing opportunities, regardless of how they might be perceived by society.