Meghan Markle’s Controversial Claims Spark Outrage Among Experts

In a recent media storm, Meghan Markle has found herself at the center of controversy after making bold claims about the British press.

Royal expert Juliette Ryden is leading the charge against Meghan's assertions, particularly her allegation that the media used a racial slur when referring to her children, Archie and Lilibet.

Ryden didn't hold back during her appearance on ABC News Breakfast, stating emphatically that such claims are “wholly untrue.”

Meghan has been vocal about her dissatisfaction with the British media, often expressing her grievances.

However, Ryden argues that there is no evidence to support Meghan's claims of racial slurs directed at her kids.

“I've seen no reference to that whatsoever,” she stated, suggesting that Meghan's narrative might be more about her personal grievances than factual incidents.

Adding to the discussion, Ryden questioned another of Meghan's claims regarding school pickups for Archie.

Meghan suggested that if they had remained in the UK, she would have faced an overwhelming presence of journalists at the school gates.

Ryden countered this by highlighting existing laws in the UK that protect children from media harassment, emphasizing that it wouldn't have happened.

She pointed out the example of Catherine, the Duchess of Cambridge, who manages to take her children to school without any media frenzy.

“There are laws surrounding all children, not just Archie,” Ryden noted, implying that Meghan's fears were unfounded.

The comparison underscores the reality that many royal children navigate their school days without the invasive media attention Meghan describes.

Meanwhile, both UK and Australian media outlets have expressed confidence that no reputable UK publication would ever use such offensive language.

A quick dive into online resources indicates that the term Meghan referred to is more commonly used in American vernacular, which may have led to her misunderstanding.

Kyle Sandilands, a prominent Australian radio host, also weighed in on the situation, bluntly stating that Meghan needs to move on from her grievances.

He went so far as to label her an “imbecile,” reflecting a growing sentiment among critics who believe Meghan's narrative is exaggerated and self-serving.

Daniela Elsa, another commentator, has taken aim at Meghan's remarks, calling them “unintentionally hilarious.” Elsa noted that many of Meghan's statements come off as absurd rather than impactful, particularly following her latest interview in the Cut magazine.

She believes that Meghan's attempts to criticize Buckingham Palace often backfire, leaving her looking foolish.

For instance, Elsa pointed to Meghan's claim that South Africans celebrated in the streets upon her marriage to Prince Harry, comparing it to the joy felt during Nelson Mandela's release.

This comment, according to Elsa, reeks of self-aggrandizement and highlights Meghan's tendency to elevate her own importance.

Elsa also found humor in Meghan's assertion about being a role model for young girls.

Meghan expressed that her awareness of how children perceive her influences her behavior.

This statement, while earnest, struck many as overly self-important, adding to the list of cringe-worthy moments in her interviews.