The News
Meghan Markle’s Cartier Watch Sparks Controversy Over Her Children
Years ago, Meghan Markle indulged in a luxurious gift after her role as Rachel Zane in the popular legal drama “Suits” was solidified with a third season renewal.
The Duchess of Sussex treated herself to a stunning Cartier Tank Francaise watch, priced at a whopping £5,000.
But this wasn't just any purchase; Meghan had a special message engraved on the back, serving as a personal reminder of her accomplishments.
In a 2015 interview with Hello!
Magazine, Meghan revealed her long-standing admiration for the iconic Cartier watch.
She expressed how the announcement of “Suits” being picked up for a third season felt like a significant milestone in her career.
That moment prompted her to splurge on the two-tone timepiece, which she planned to pass down to her daughter one day.
The engraving “to M.M.
from M.M.”
holds deep sentimental value for her, signifying the connection between mother and daughter.
However, recent discussions have raised eyebrows regarding the existence of Meghan's children, particularly Lilibet.
Some skeptics have questioned whether Meghan would even be able to give her daughter such a gift, considering claims that Lilibet might not exist.
This uncertainty has led to speculation about where Meghan could possibly send the watch if her daughter were indeed real.
A source close to Meghan, Tyler Perry, revealed that she is currently residing at the Beverly Wilshire Hotel, while Prince Harry is in San Francisco.
Meanwhile, their residence, affectionately dubbed Casa Mudslide, is back on the rental market.
With no birthday celebrations or gifts reported for Lilibet, it seems doubtful that a special occasion will take place this year.
Interestingly, there have been no public messages from the Royal Family wishing Lilibet a happy birthday, which some believe hints at a deeper truth regarding her existence.
The lack of acknowledgment from the royals could be seen as a significant snub to Meghan, especially considering the recent birthday of their son, Archie, who turned four on the same day as King Charles' coronation.
Despite the royal family's busy schedule on that day, the absence of any birthday wishes for Archie has not gone unnoticed.
Online discussions have suggested that there's still a need for tangible evidence of the children's existence, with some doubting the authenticity of recent photos.
A Reddit user even pointed out discrepancies in images purportedly showing Archie, claiming they resemble Princess Eugenie's son, August, instead.
Moreover, there have been no updates or photos from the Sussexes regarding their children in many months.
Speculation continues to grow, fueled by the absence of birthday celebrations or christening images.
Harry reportedly returned to San Francisco after the coronation, while Meghan spent her time hiking, further fueling rumors about their family dynamics.
The lack of visibility for both Archie and Lilibet raises questions about the palace's knowledge and involvement.
Some believe that the royal family may have been misled, leading them to remain silent about the children.
Observers note that the palace's privacy regarding the Sussex kids could indicate they were unaware of the full story.
As whispers of a potential revelation circulate, many are left wondering if the truth about the Sussex children will eventually come to light.
The timing of these discussions, particularly around significant royal events, adds to the intrigue.
The palace's cautious approach suggests they are carefully navigating this sensitive situation, aware of the potential backlash.
With speculation mounting, it remains to be seen how this saga will unfold.
Will the royal family address these claims, or will the mystery surrounding Meghan's children continue to linger?
As more details emerge, the public is left grappling with questions that may redefine our understanding of the Sussex family narrative.