Meghan Markle’s Bold Move: A Push for Prince Harry in U.S. Defense

In a surprising twist, a public relations piece from Meghan Markle's team has surfaced in Forbes, suggesting that she and Prince Harry should explore roles within the U.S. defense industrial complex.

This unexpected recommendation has sparked a wave of reactions, particularly from veterans who are skeptical about the couple's suitability for such serious positions.

The article hints at a significant transformation underway for Prince Harry amidst the ongoing fallout from his recent memoir, “Endgame.”

With the royal family drama laid bare for all to see, the narrative proposes that Harry could pivot from his current celebrity status to a more impactful role in national security.

The suggestion is that he could leverage his experiences to advocate for veterans' affairs, a cause close to his heart.

However, not everyone is on board with this idea.

Critics point out Harry's limited military experience, having only risen to the rank of captain in the British Army.

Many veterans question whether he possesses the necessary credentials or commitment to advise on matters as critical as national defense.

The skepticism is palpable, especially given the couple's controversial past.

One veteran expressed discomfort at the thought of Prince Harry and Meghan being involved with the military.

Concerns about their loyalty and ability to handle sensitive information were paramount.

The veteran recalled how Harry had publicly shared personal details about his life, raising alarms about whether he and Meghan could be trusted with national security secrets.

Moreover, Harry's past admissions regarding substance use have further fueled doubts.

Critics wonder how someone with such a background could contribute positively to national security.

The implications of his actions and statements cast a long shadow over the couple's potential involvement in military affairs.

Adding to the controversy, Meghan has faced accusations of dishonesty in legal matters, which raises questions about her credibility.

If they were ever queried about sensitive information, would she be truthful?

These considerations lead many to believe that the couple lacks the temperament required for serious roles in the defense sector.

Despite the backlash, the couple seems undeterred.

Their focus appears to be shifting toward establishing a foothold in the defense industry, possibly seeing it as a new avenue for influence.

Some speculate that Harry's ambition to secure intellectual property rights for his ventures might be driving this shift.

Interestingly, while the Sussexes are attempting to carve out a new path, other organizations like UPS are successfully securing major military contracts.

This contrast highlights the uphill battle Harry and Meghan may face in gaining acceptance within the defense community.

Critics have labeled the Forbes article as one of the most amusing PR efforts yet from Meghan's camp.

They argue that it reflects a desperate attempt to rehabilitate their image and establish relevance in a field where they have no prior experience.

As the narrative unfolds, it remains to be seen whether this strategy will resonate with the American public or if it will be met with further skepticism.

The couple's future endeavors in this arena could either solidify their place in the defense conversation or reinforce doubts about their capabilities.

Ultimately, the discourse surrounding Harry and Meghan's potential roles in national security raises important questions about accountability, trust, and the expectations placed on public figures.

Whether they can navigate this complex landscape remains a topic of heated debate among veterans and the general public alike.