Meghan Markle: The Untalented Royal?

A Hollywood Insider Weighs In

In a recent revelation that has sparked considerable debate, a prominent Hollywood figure has openly critiqued Meghan Markle's skills in the entertainment industry.

Jeremy Zimmer, managing director of United Talent Agency, didn't hold back when discussing Markle's talents during an event at the Cannes Lions advertising festival in France.

His comments come on the heels of Spotify's decision to terminate their £1.8 million deal with Markle and Prince Harry after just one season of their podcast.

Zimmer, who has guided the careers of notable stars like Benedict Cumberbatch, expressed his lack of surprise at Spotify's choice.

He bluntly stated that Markle “wasn't a major audio talent or necessarily any type of talent.” This assertion raises questions about the couple's appeal in the entertainment realm, especially considering the hefty financial investments made by streaming giants.

The crux of Zimmer's argument revolves around the misconception that fame alone equates to talent.

He pointed out that many successful podcasters start small and gradually build their reputation.

However, he suggested that Markle seemed to believe she could achieve success without the necessary experience or understanding of the podcasting landscape.

According to him, successful podcasts typically require a unique angle and compelling guests—qualities he claims Markle lacks.

He went further, mocking the idea that Markle and Harry could somehow improve upon the works of literary greats like Charles Dickens.

Zimmer questioned the sincerity of their projects, particularly the Invictus program, suggesting it was more about self-promotion than genuine concern for wounded soldiers.

He noted that while many Americans admire the British royal family, they do not necessarily need a monarchy of their own, indicating that the allure of royal titles may have initially helped secure lucrative deals for the couple.

Despite their royal connections, Zimmer indicated that audiences can be fickle, often moving on to the next big thing.

He argued that Markle and Harry have run out of sellable narratives, as the silence from the royal family has worked against them.

Their notoriety, he claimed, stems more from media attention than actual talent or interesting life stories.

Zimmer also highlighted how Markle's criticisms of the monarchy have backfired, alienating her from potential supporters.

He suggested that if she had been more receptive to advice and less consumed by her ego, she might have navigated her circumstances more successfully.

Initially, as a royal, Markle had the opportunity to make a significant impact, but her obsession with control ultimately led to their current predicament.

The fallout from their exit from royal duties has left them grappling with a lack of direction, Zimmer noted.

He speculated that both Markle and Harry are now facing a rather mundane existence, devoid of the family ties they once had.

Their children, he remarked, might grow up without the royal family's influence, which could be detrimental.

As for their future endeavors, Zimmer questioned why Markle and Harry did not pursue opportunities within fashion or modeling before leaving their royal roles.

He expressed skepticism about their understanding of their own talents, suggesting that even Spotify likely anticipated their eventual downfall.

With Netflix reportedly reconsidering their partnership with the couple, Zimmer urged the streaming platform to cut its losses.

He described the couple's attempts to capitalize on their royal status as misguided, emphasizing that having a title does not guarantee success or entitlement to special treatment.

In light of these developments, it seems that Markle and Harry's journey through the entertainment industry may be fraught with challenges.

As Zimmer aptly pointed out, true success requires hard work and dedication, qualities that he believes the couple has yet to demonstrate in their post-royal lives.