**Meghan Markle Mocked for Comparing Herself to Nelson Mandela**

Meghan Markle found herself at the center of controversy once again after drawing comparisons between herself and iconic leader Nelson Mandela in a recent interview with The Cut magazine.

The former Suits actress recounted an anecdote where a cast member of The Lion King allegedly told her that South Africans celebrated her marriage to Prince Harry in a similar manner to Mandela's release from prison.

Host Karl Stefanovic, known for his candid criticism of Meghan, openly expressed skepticism towards her remarks during a conversation with Nine's London correspondent, Tracy Vo.

Stefanovic questioned how such statements would be received by the royal family, particularly highlighting the Mandela references.

His co-host, Alison Langdon, chimed in, describing the comparison as tone-deaf.

In a moment of feigned empathy, Stefanovic quipped about Meghan being misunderstood, prompting a playful exchange with Langdon, who is notably critical of the Sussexes.

The duo bantered about the appropriateness of likening oneself to Mandela, with Stefanovic eventually conceding, albeit humorously, to supporting Meghan in light of her controversial comments.

Meanwhile, outspoken critic Piers Morgan did not hold back in his scathing assessment of Meghan's interview, labeling it as self-aggrandizing, disingenuous, and hypocritical.

He singled out the Mandela anecdote as particularly distasteful, condemning Meghan for leveraging her title to denigrate the institution that bestowed it upon her.

Across the Atlantic, American commentators echoed these sentiments, accusing Meghan of being disconnected from reality and exploiting her royal status to perpetuate negativity towards the monarchy, especially following her and Harry's decision to step back from official duties.

The backlash against Meghan extended to her use of the Duchess of Sussex title despite her apparent disdain for the royal family.

Archbishop Lucy Burge from Boston raised questions about Meghan's motives, questioning why she continues to retain a title she seemingly despises.

Criticism mounted online, with individuals lambasting Meghan for allegedly tarnishing the royal family's reputation and perpetuating falsehoods.

The ongoing rift between Prince Harry and his relatives, notably Prince Charles and Prince William, was also scrutinized, with Meghan's purported revelations further straining familial relationships.

Royal reporter Richard Palmer and columnist Dan Wooten joined the chorus of dissent, refuting Meghan's claims of facing intrusive media scrutiny while accompanying her son to school.

Palmer dismissed the notion as fantastical, citing stringent regulations governing press behavior around minors in the UK.

Wooten echoed similar sentiments, denouncing the alleged fabrications in Meghan's narrative.

As the debate surrounding Meghan's contentious statements continues to escalate, the repercussions of her words reverberate within royal circles, fueling speculation and discord.