Meghan Markle Excluded from King Charles III’s Coronation: A Royal Rift Deepens

In a surprising turn of events, Meghan Markle has officially been left off the guest list for King Charles III's coronation.

Buckingham Palace recently confirmed that Prince Harry will attend the ceremony solo, raising eyebrows and sparking speculation about the implications of Meghan's absence.

Royal experts suggest that this exclusion signifies a deeper rift between the Duchess of Sussex and the royal family, intensifying the ongoing rivalry that has captured public attention.

The decision to exclude Meghan from such a significant royal event is seen as a clear message from the monarchy.

Sources close to the family indicate that this move is a response to Meghan's past criticisms and allegations against the institution.

It appears that the royal family is keen on keeping her at arm's length, even as King Charles attempts to mend familial ties.

The tension is palpable, and many are left wondering what might unfold next.

While Meghan plans to spend the coronation weekend in California with her children, speculation abounds regarding the motivations behind her banishment.

Observers believe there could be more going on behind the scenes, potentially setting the stage for Meghan to unveil further revelations about her experiences within the royal family.

The stakes are high, and the public is eager to see how this saga continues to develop.

Since stepping back from royal duties in January 2020, tensions have simmered between Harry, Meghan, and their relatives.

The couple relinquished their HRH titles and have since been embroiled in various controversies, including their Netflix documentary and Harry's memoir, “Spare.”

These events have fueled calls for the removal of their Duke and Duchess titles, igniting debates about their future standing within the royal hierarchy.

Recent reports suggest that discussions about stripping Harry and Meghan of their titles have gained traction.

A new book referenced by the Mirror indicates that key figures within the royal family are now involved in these conversations.

While King Charles reportedly opposes such drastic measures, other senior royals appear less sympathetic, reflecting a divide within the family regarding how to handle the couple's ongoing public critiques.

Despite Charles' affection for his son, the pressure to respond to Harry's continued attacks on the monarchy is mounting.

The situation raises questions about the legality of removing their titles, as the monarch alone does not have the authority to do so.

Such an action would require an Act of Parliament, a rare occurrence that hasn't happened since 1917 when George V enacted the Titles Deprivation Act during World War I.

Complicating matters further are the royal titles of Harry and Meghan's children.

Initially, due to their parents' departure from royal duties, Lilibet and Archie were not granted titles.

However, in March, they were officially recognized as Prince and Princess on the royal family's website.

This change has sparked discussion about the implications of their royal status and what it means for their future.

As Archie prepares to celebrate his fourth birthday on the same day as the coronation, some observers lament the missed opportunity for him to experience such a historic event.

Ingrid Seward, editor-in-chief of Majesty Magazine, expressed disappointment, noting how thrilling it would have been for him to witness the grandeur of the ceremony, complete with soldiers and carriages.

The ongoing saga of Harry and Meghan continues to captivate audiences worldwide.

With each twist and turn, the narrative surrounding their relationship with the royal family evolves, leaving many eager for the next chapter.