Meghan Markle Demands Royal Titles for Her Children Amidst Controversy

In a recent revelation, royal expert Neil Shawn disclosed that Meghan Markle insists on being addressed as a duchess and expects others to refer to her children with their official titles: Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet.

This demand has sparked discussions among royal commentators about the implications of such titles and the ongoing drama surrounding Prince Harry and Meghan's offspring.

Ingrid Seward, another royal commentator, weighed in on the contrasting ways in which Harry and Meghan announced their children's titles compared to King Charles's formal declaration regarding his brother, Prince Edward.

The King issued an official statement from Buckingham Palace, expressing his pleasure in conferring the Dukedom of Edinburgh upon Edward, the Earl of Wessex.

This announcement was described by Seward as grand, almost as if it were displayed in a gilded frame for all to see at Buckingham Palace.

On the flip side, Harry and Meghan opted for a more informal route.

They had their spokesperson inform the public that their daughter Lilibet would be baptized as “Royal Princess” during her christening in Los Angeles.

Similarly, Archie would be referred to as “Prince.” Seward noted the timing of this announcement, emphasizing that it came six months after the couple had hoped the palace would preemptively announce the titles themselves.

Ryan Mark Parsons, known from the show “Apprentice,” criticized Harry and Meghan's choice to use the title “Princess” for Lilibet.

He argued that given Harry's previous public criticisms of the royal family, it seems contradictory for him to accept royal titles for his children.

Parsons expressed his belief that if he were in Harry's shoes, he would distance his family from the monarchy entirely, rejecting any royal titles altogether.

The hypocrisy, according to Parsons, is glaring.

He pointed out that Harry and Meghan have publicly derided royal traditions through various media outlets, yet they still wish to affiliate their children with the royal family through these titles.

He urged them to make a clear choice about their position regarding the monarchy and suggested that maintaining some integrity would require them to forgo royal titles for their kids.

Adding to the unfolding narrative, royal expert Richard Eden speculated that King Charles might use a precedent established during Edward's title conferment to prevent Archie from inheriting the Duke of Sussex title.

The King's decision to ensure that the Dukedom of Edinburgh would revert to the crown after Edward's passing indicates a strategic move to limit future title claims.

Eden elaborated on this notion during a discussion on the Palace Confidential Talk Show, suggesting that the King's intention is to stop Archie from gaining the Duke of Sussex title.

However, he acknowledged the complexity of this situation, as it would require similar actions with all royal dukes, potentially upsetting respected titles like those of the Dukes of Gloucester and Kent.

As the debate continues, many are left wondering what this means for the future of the Sussex family and their relationship with the monarchy.

The royal family's dynamics are ever-evolving, and the decisions made now could have lasting implications for how titles are perceived and utilized within the royal framework.

The tension surrounding royal titles and the Sussexes' approach to them reflect deeper issues within the royal family.

It raises questions about identity, tradition, and the role of modern royals in a changing society.

The world watches closely as Harry and Meghan navigate this complex landscape, balancing their public personas with their personal choices.