**Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Feud with Oprah Escalates**

The ongoing feud between Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and Oprah Winfrey has taken a new turn as reports confirm tensions are at an all-time high.

Royal biographer Angela Levin has accused the Duke and Duchess of Sussex of fabricating lies during their explosive interview with Oprah in 2021.

In a recent interview with Sky News Australia, Levin criticized the couple for receiving a human rights award, insinuating that it was undeserved and based on falsehoods presented during the Oprah interview.

Levin boldly stated, “This award for heroism is for absolutely nothing.

It's for the Oprah Winfrey interview, which doesn't have any proof.

There were over 30 lies in that interview.”

The accusations of deceit have further fueled speculation about the authenticity of the Sussexes' claims and the impact of their revelations on their public image.

Adding fuel to the fire, rumors surfaced that Meghan Markle was left fuming after discovering that Oprah Winfrey had extended invitations to numerous Hollywood celebrities for her upcoming birthday bash, excluding Meghan from the guest list.

This exclusion has raised eyebrows and cast a shadow of doubt on the state of the relationship between the former royals and the media mogul.

In a separate development, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry recently inked a lucrative deal with Netflix for a series of projects, including a documentary detailing their exit from the royal family and subsequent life outside the monarchy.

Despite Meghan's previous complaints about media scrutiny, royal expert Nick Bullen likened the couple's approach to that of reality TV stars, suggesting that they have transformed their lives into a Kardashian-esque spectacle.

Bullen remarked, “It's great for viewers in terms of a reality show, but why do they feel the need to share that with us if they want to keep some privacy in their lives?”

He expressed surprise at the level of exposure the couple was willing to embrace, noting that the documentary format lacked the necessary editorial balance and critical inquiry typically associated with such productions.

In a teaser clip from the upcoming documentary, Meghan Markle voiced her discontent about the engagement interview she and Prince Harry had to undergo in 2017.

She likened the experience to a scripted reality show, claiming they were guided on how to present themselves and showcase her engagement ring.

However, Bullen countered her perspective by highlighting the traditional nature of such interviews within the royal family and the historical precedent set by previous couples.

Speaking to Fox News Digital, Bullen emphasized, “The weddings are in many ways not quite state events, but certainly national events with all the pageantry attached to a royal wedding.

So I think Meghan is somewhat confused.”

He pointed out the irony of Meghan's criticism of the engagement interview while engaging in a similar process of crafting her own narrative through their current projects.

BBC journalist Michelle Hussain, who conducted Meghan and Harry's engagement interview, refuted claims of rehearsal and manipulation.

She clarified, “We talked about what the interview would cover, what they felt comfortable sharing.

After that, we went and set up our cameras.

They went away for a bit and when they came back, we recorded a 20-minute interview.”

The behind-the-scenes insight provided by Hussain sheds light on the collaborative nature of the interview process and challenges allegations of premeditated scripting.