Meghan Markle: A Masterclass in Victimhood and Beige Fashion

In recent months, Meghan Markle has made only a handful of public appearances, but each one seems to carry a common thread that raises eyebrows.

This thread?

Her seemingly endless claims of victimhood, which she seems to wield like a badge of honor.

Let's break it down and see what's really going on.

First up, we saw Meghan at a polo match back in April, followed by her so-called royal tour of Nigeria and her appearance at the ESPY Awards.

While she looked stunning, there was something peculiar about her overall vibe.

It's hard not to notice that she appeared almost skeletal, as if she hadn't indulged in a meal for days.

But more striking than her appearance was her choice of wardrobe—lots of whites, beiges, and other neutral tones.

Now, here's where it gets interesting.

During her Netflix series, Meghan made it clear that her muted color palette wasn't just a style choice; it was a statement about her time as a royal.

She claimed that she rarely wore vibrant colors because she didn't want to overshadow anyone.

According to her, the royal protocol dictated that she stick to muted tones to avoid ruffling feathers.

Meghan recounted how she felt compelled to wear beige and camel to blend in, stating, “I rarely wore color.” She even mentioned that one should avoid wearing the same color as senior royals, including Queen Elizabeth.

So, she opted for shades that would likely never be donned by Her Majesty or other family members.

However, given Meghan's penchant for standing out, her claims seem disingenuous at best.

It's hard to take her seriously when she insists that her wardrobe was a deliberate effort to fit in.

After all, Meghan has consistently shown a flair for the dramatic, often portraying herself as the victim of royal expectations.

Yet, one must wonder if her muted fashion choices are simply a reflection of her personal taste rather than a misguided attempt to appease her in-laws.

As she continues to paint herself as the wronged party, one can't help but question what might happen if her marriage to Prince Harry were to dissolve.

If she perceives trivial matters as sources of victimization now, what claims might she make during a divorce?

It's likely she wouldn't part ways quietly, and could very well try to cast Harry in a negative light.

Imagine the scenarios: would she blame him for her struggles with weight loss or other personal issues?

Would she adopt a narrative reminiscent of Amber Heard's controversial claims?

The potential fallout could put Harry in a precarious position, and it's clear that Meghan has a history of spinning narratives that serve her interests.

Critics have pointed out that Meghan's obsession with muted colors is puzzling.

Some have even likened her appearance to that of a “beige SpongeBob SquarePants.” While the comparison may be a stretch, it does highlight how her fashion choices have become a talking point among observers.

Moreover, questions linger about why journalists don't challenge Meghan and Harry on their apparent hypocrisy.

There seems to be a reluctance in the media to confront them, perhaps due to their influence and the way they've handled past criticisms.

They've cultivated an environment where scrutiny feels risky, and this dynamic allows them to sidestep tough questions.

Ultimately, Meghan's narrative of being a victim trapped by royal constraints continues to unfold, but many are starting to see through it.

Whether it's her fashion choices or her public persona, the scrutiny is intensifying.

As she navigates her path, one thing is certain: the world is watching closely, and the implications of her actions could reverberate far beyond her muted wardrobe.