Meghan and Harry’s Royal Title Drama: A Controversial Quest for Recognition

In a whirlwind of controversy, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are facing backlash for their desire to have their children receive royal titles after relocating to the United States.

This situation raises eyebrows, especially considering America's historical fight to distance itself from monarchy.

Royal expert Kinsey Schofield has been vocal about her skepticism regarding the couple's motivations, suggesting that financial gain may be at the heart of their aspirations.

Schofield, speaking on GB News, questioned why Harry, who has previously expressed a desire for a family free from institutional constraints, now insists on royal titles for his offspring.

She pointed out that their daughter, Lilibet, was born in America and asked, “What exactly is she a princess of?” Her remarks highlight a significant contradiction in Harry's narrative about wanting a more normal family life.

The expert further elaborated on the peculiar nature of this request, noting that Americans fought a war to reject royal recognition.

“I don't really understand what the objective is unless it's for money,” she stated, emphasizing the disconnect between their American life and royal traditions.

The inquiry into the couple's motives continues to grow.

Adding to the intrigue, Samantha Markle, Meghan's half-sister, has raised questions about the very existence of Archie Harrison and Lilibet Diana.

During an interview with LBC's Nick Ferrari, she speculated on conspiracy theories suggesting that the children are mere fabrications.

Samantha lamented that even their father, Thomas Markle, has not had the opportunity to see his grandchildren's faces clearly.

Expressing her sadness as a grandparent, Samantha remarked, “You want to see that your children are happy, they're your offspring.”

However, she also propagated the idea that the public has not had a proper glimpse of the children, questioning why there hasn't been any visual confirmation of their existence.

Ferrari countered her claims, asserting, “Well yeah, they do exist.”

Samantha conceded that while the children likely exist, there remains a lack of visual evidence.

She noted that even neighbors in Montecito have not seen the Sussex children, raising further speculation about their visibility to the public eye.

The situation took a more personal turn when Meghan reportedly reacted angrily to Rebel Wilson's mother, who inquired about the children's whereabouts.

This incident further fueled rumors about the couple's parenting choices and the public's curiosity surrounding their children.

Samantha didn't shy away from critiquing Meghan's pregnancy, suggesting that her baby bump appeared to change shape, raising questions about its authenticity.

“Who knew a baby bump could be rectangular?”

she quipped, pointing to inconsistencies that have fueled public skepticism.

Meanwhile, new reports have emerged indicating that Meghan is keen on having her children attend King Charles' upcoming coronation.

Royal expert Neil Shawn commented on this development, suggesting that if the request were denied, it could make the new monarch appear unkind or dismissive.

However, Shawn also pointed out that the children may not have a strong relationship with the royal family, as they have been raised away from traditional royal protocols.

This raises concerns about whether they would know how to conduct themselves at such a significant event, which is fraught with expectations and formalities.

As the coronation approaches, questions linger about the implications of Meghan and Harry's decisions.

Experts speculate that introducing the children to the king during this monumental ceremony could distract from the event itself, potentially overshadowing its historical significance.

With so much speculation swirling around the Sussexes and their children, the world watches closely.