Meghan and Harry’s Name Change: A Desperate Bid for Relevance

In the whirlwind of royal drama, rumors are swirling about a potential name change for Meghan Markle, with many speculating that she might adopt her maiden name, Spencer.

This chatter raises eyebrows, especially considering the couple's declining popularity in both the UK and the United States.

What could possibly be behind this move?

The question of names holds significant weight, particularly within the context of the British monarchy.

For Harry, once the Duke of Sussex, his royal ties opened doors across the UK and Commonwealth.

However, as the dust settles from their tumultuous departure from royal duties, it appears that their titles now carry little more than the burden of betrayal and disappointment.

Many believe that Meghan's desire to revert to Spencer stems from a longing for the fame and admiration that once surrounded her late mother-in-law, Princess Diana.

Yet, despite her efforts, the public's affection has waned dramatically.

In fact, Meghan's approval rating has plummeted to a staggering negative 47 in the UK, while Harry isn't far behind.

It seems that the couple's attempts at rebranding have backfired spectacularly.

Their recent ventures, including the much-publicized interview with Oprah and Harry's memoir “Spare,” have not endeared them to the public.

Instead, these projects have been perceived as self-indulgent, further alienating them from their former supporters.

The couple's actions have led many to view them as out of touch, and their reputation is suffering as a result.

In the United States, where they hoped to find a more welcoming audience, the situation isn't looking any brighter.

Their brand, once synonymous with royal glamour, now feels tarnished and untrustworthy.

Even executives from Spotify, who initially backed their endeavors, seem to be reconsidering their association with the couple, given the lack of compelling content produced under their partnership.

With their royal connections fading into obscurity, Meghan and Harry find themselves in a precarious position.

The allure of their titles has diminished, leaving them scrambling for new avenues to maintain their relevance.

The idea of a name change appears to be a desperate attempt to distance themselves from their past and reinvent their public personas.

Rebranding is often a strategy employed by companies facing declining interest in their products.

For Meghan and Harry, however, the challenge lies in the fact that their royal cachet is no longer a selling point.

They've exhausted their supply of royal gossip, leaving them with little else to offer to a curious public.

As they contemplate a name change, the implications are significant.

Should Meghan drop her Duchess title and revert to being Meghan Rachel Spencer, it would signal a major shift in her identity.

While she could still technically be referred to as Princess Henry, it seems unlikely that she would embrace that label, especially in light of her self-proclaimed feminist values.

The notion of returning to the Spencer name may also be tied to aspirations beyond mere celebrity status.

There's speculation that Meghan might be eyeing a political career or seeking to align herself with influential figures in business.

After all, a name steeped in aristocracy could open doors that a tarnished royal title cannot.

Ultimately, it seems that Meghan and Harry are caught in a web of their own making.

Their attempts to stay relevant in a rapidly changing landscape have led to a series of missteps that have left them isolated.

As they navigate this new chapter, the question remains: can they truly reinvent themselves, or will they continue to be defined by their past?

In a world where public perception can shift overnight, the stakes are high for the couple.

Whether they succeed in their rebranding efforts or not, one thing is clear: the name Spencer carries with it a legacy that they hope to harness as they search for a way back into the public's good graces.