Meghan and Harry’s Kids: Debunking the Conspiracy Theories

In recent months, a rather bizarre rumor has taken root online, claiming that Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's children, Archie and Lilibet, do not exist.

This wild speculation has gained traction among skeptics, leading many to scrutinize the Sussexes' lives with a magnifying glass.

However, these claims are extreme and lack any credible evidence.

To understand the origins of this controversy, it's essential to look back at Meghan's past.

Before marrying Prince Harry in 2018, she was previously wed to Trevor Engelson from 2011 to 2013.

Following her royal marriage, Engelson's name resurfaced in discussions, with some commentators suggesting he might possess undisclosed insights about Meghan.

This speculation fueled various conspiracy theories, particularly regarding the authenticity of her children.

In March 2022, an anonymous post emerged, allegedly from Engelson, claiming that Archie and Lilibet were mere fabrications.

According to this post, Meghan supposedly staged her pregnancies as a ploy to enhance her public persona.

While this narrative captivated some, it is crucial to approach such anonymous claims with skepticism.

Engelson has never publicly commented on Meghan or their children, making the authenticity of this post highly questionable.

It's important to remember that anyone can hide behind anonymity online.

Engelson would have significant reasons to avoid involvement in such serious allegations, especially if they lack concrete evidence.

Slandering an ex-wife and accusing her of faking childbirth could lead to severe legal repercussions if proven false.

Moreover, those inclined to believe these conspiracy theories often do so because it aligns with their existing biases.

This tendency, known as confirmation bias, can cloud judgment and lead to the acceptance of unfounded claims.

Extraordinary assertions demand extraordinary evidence, yet the anonymous post provides none to validate its accusations.

The notion that Meghan could fake two high-risk pregnancies without detection is implausible.

Pregnancy and childbirth involve numerous medical professionals and family members.

It's nearly impossible to keep such significant life events a secret, especially under intense public scrutiny.

Legal birth records exist in hospitals, and if Archie and Lilibet were not real, it would be nearly impossible for such evidence to remain hidden.

Additionally, Meghan was photographed multiple times during her pregnancies, showcasing her baby bumps.

The logistics of fabricating ultrasounds and medical appointments would require a vast conspiracy that seems far-fetched.

Anyone familiar with the realities of pregnancy knows that the physical symptoms—swollen feet, back pain, and the act of breastfeeding—cannot be convincingly faked over time.

Critics also point out the absence of publicly released birth certificates for Archie and Lilibet.

However, the Sussexes are under no obligation to share private records.

Their births were documented according to UK law, and the lack of public disclosure does not imply non-existence.

Royal births typically involve voluntary announcements, not mandatory public documentation.

Furthermore, claims of missing baptism records are equally unfounded.

These ceremonies often occur privately, as is common for minor royals and celebrity children.

The burden of proof lies with those making the conspiracy claims, not on the Sussexes to disprove them.

Without actual evidence, these theories remain nothing more than baseless conjecture.

Another aspect of the conspiracy involves the assertion that all photos of Archie and Lilibet are digitally manipulated.

The Sussexes have shared numerous images of Archie throughout the years, which would be incredibly difficult to fake convincingly.

Variations in lighting, angles, and natural imperfections make photo manipulation an unlikely explanation.

Moreover, the idea that no one outside the Sussexes' inner circle has interacted with the children is misleading.

Just because we don't have a detailed account of every moment doesn't mean the children are fictional.

Many families, including public figures, choose to keep their children's lives private.

The most audacious claim suggests that Archie and Lilibet will one day reappear as teenagers, pushing some agenda.

This scenario is not only improbable but also highlights the mental gymnastics some individuals are willing to perform to deny the children's existence.

The absence of verifiable evidence to support these claims only underscores their absurdity.

Ultimately, the crux of the issue lies in the lack of credible evidence.

Anonymous posts and unverified claims cannot be accepted as truth without substantial proof.

The Sussexes deserve the presumption of innocence and the right to raise their children away from the public eye.

In light of the available information, the most reasonable conclusion is that Archie and Lilibet exist as stated.

Engaging in speculation about their legitimacy serves no purpose and only perpetuates harmful narratives.

As we navigate this complex topic, it's essential to prioritize facts and empathy over unfounded rumors.