Meghan and Harry’s Archwell Faces Final Trademark Delay

Meghan and Harry's company, Archwell, is currently facing its last trademark delay after three years.

The archetype trademark has been officially completed, raising questions about the future of Archwell Audio.

If Archwell Audio is indeed discontinued, it would leave Archwell Productions and Archwell Original Not-For-Profit as the remaining entities, purportedly for philanthropic purposes.

Reports suggest that Archwell Productions has only one staff member, and the company is also encountering challenges with the trademark office, with only one extension left out of the permitted five.

Allegedly, the fourth attempt to extend the trademark was denied due to lack of clarity regarding purpose and product.

Amidst these issues, there are claims that content featuring Kevin Costner is being utilized to divert attention from the struggles faced by Archwell.

Furthermore, concerns have been raised about Prince Harry's involvement with Balmoral and Invictus, indicating a potential distraction from the ongoing troubles within Archwell.

Staff turnover within the company appears to be ongoing, leading to speculations about its diminishing operations.

French journalists reportedly visited Archwell's empty office space in Beverly Hills, revealing a lack of activity and transparency within the organization.

The journalists even produced a documentary film highlighting the company's opaque practices.

Archwell, which has long been associated with Meghan, has been scrutinized for its financial dealings, with allegations of money laundering and lack of genuine philanthropic efforts.

Despite Meghan's involvement, Prince Harry's role in the company's financial activities remains unclear, raising suspicions about the true intentions behind Archwell's operations.

The involvement of WME in overseeing the operational aspects of Archwell Productions has fueled speculations about the Harkles' diminishing ties to the company and the dwindling staff engagement.

Recent reports have indicated that despite receiving a substantial donation of $10 million from a foundation in California, Meghan and Harry have not allocated the funds to any charitable causes.

Questions have emerged about the utilization of the donated money and the lack of transparency surrounding Archwell's financial management.

Concerns have been raised about the apparent diversion of funds towards personal expenses and legal fees, casting shadows on the credibility of Archwell's charitable endeavors.

The scrutiny on Archwell intensified when it was revealed that the company's trademark application for their non-profit initiatives had been rejected due to vagueness and failure to meet necessary requirements.

The application, filed by Cobblestone Lane LLC, linked to Meghan's longtime Hollywood lawyer, lacked clarity in defining the goods and services associated with the non-profit entity.

The rejection of the trademark application further underscores the challenges faced by Archwell in establishing a credible and transparent philanthropic venture.

In light of these developments, the future of Archwell remains uncertain, with mounting concerns about its financial practices and commitment to philanthropy.

The controversies surrounding Meghan and Harry's involvement in the company raise questions about their dedication to charitable causes and the transparency of their operations.

As investigations into Archwell's activities continue, the public awaits clarity on the utilization of donated funds and the company's adherence to ethical standards in its philanthropic endeavors.