**Meghan and Harry Accused of Turning Invictus Games into Self-Promotion Platform**

Recently, shocking revelations have surfaced regarding Meghan and Harry's conduct at the Invictus Games.

An eyewitness at the event took to social media to expose the couple's alleged tactics of inflating their support base.

According to the tweet, the stands at the games were noticeably empty, yet Meghan and Harry purportedly had individuals strategically placed to create the illusion of a larger audience.

The eyewitness expressed dismay at how the couple seemed to be using the event as a personal stage, with photographers tailing them and Meghan making multiple wardrobe changes throughout the day.

Moreover, the tweet called out Harry for allegedly bringing his own supporters to the games instead of relying on genuine backing from the public.

Drawing parallels to fabricated online support, the eyewitness likened Meghan's actions to those of Amber Heard, accusing her of orchestrating fake profiles to boost their popularity.

The revelation shed light on the couple's alleged manipulation of public perception, painting a concerning picture of their motives at the Invictus Games.

In a separate development, reports emerged of a clash between Meghan and Princess Catherine, also known as Kate, over a trivial incident involving lip gloss.

Criticism was directed at Meghan for reportedly asking for Kate's lip gloss, a move deemed unhygienic and inappropriate by many women.

The incident sparked outrage among commentators, highlighting a perceived lack of decorum on Meghan's part.

Furthermore, speculations abound regarding Meghan's aspirations to emulate Princess Diana, despite facing dwindling public support.

Observers have noted a pattern in Meghan's behavior mirroring that of the late Princess, from her fashion choices to symbolic gestures at Diana's gravesite.

The conjecture extends to Harry's purported desire for Meghan to embody his mother, leading to uncomfortable comparisons between the two relationships.

As scrutiny intensifies, questions arise about the couple's intentions at the Invictus Games.

Critics point to Harry's extended speeches and Meghan's frequent wardrobe changes as evidence of a self-centered agenda.

The duo's alleged exploitation of the event for personal gain has raised concerns about their priorities and commitment to the cause they claim to champion.

Amidst the controversies surrounding Meghan and Harry, dissenting voices challenge the narrative propagated by their staunch supporters.

Accusations of self-absorption and insensitivity towards the veterans participating in the games have fueled criticism against the couple.

The juxtaposition of their lavish lifestyle choices with the solemnity of the event has sparked debates about their true motivations and dedication to the Invictus Games' mission.

In conclusion, the unfolding saga of Meghan and Harry's involvement in the Invictus Games underscores a deeper narrative of self-aggrandizement and questionable ethics.

The couple's actions have ignited a firestorm of debate and skepticism, casting a shadow over their purported altruism.

As the controversy rages on, the public remains divided on Meghan and Harry's true intentions, raising pertinent questions about integrity and authenticity in their public image.