Liz Garbus Calls Out Buckingham Palace Over Harry and Meghan Docuseries

In a recent interview, Liz Garbus, the director behind five of the six episodes of Netflix’s docuseries on Harry and Meghan, expressed her frustrations with Buckingham Palace.

According to Sky News Australia, Garbus claims that the Palace has been actively trying to undermine the series.

She emphasized the importance of linking personal narratives with broader historical themes, revealing her intent to create a richer context for the couple’s story.

Garbus shared her perspective during an engaging conversation with Vanity Fair.

While she acknowledged the couple’s romantic journey as the backbone of the series, she insisted that it was crucial to weave in larger historical issues.

She noted that the royal couple was surprisingly open to exploring angles they might not have initially considered, which she found refreshing.

However, the Royal News Network has suggested that Garbus may have inadvertently cast the couple in a less favorable light.

Brittany, a commentator from the network, analyzed Garbus’s interview on Twitter, suggesting that there was a disconnect between the director’s vision and what Harry and Meghan had hoped to convey.

The couple appeared to believe that their love story alone would captivate audiences, but Garbus saw things differently.

As a seasoned filmmaker with over 25 years of experience, Garbus recognized that the subject matter could be somewhat dull.

Despite this realization, she chose to proceed with the project.

Interestingly, she had previously been involved with “Pearl,” an animated series linked to Meghan that was ultimately scrapped by Netflix.

Brittany’s insights painted a picture of Garbus viewing the couple’s love story as largely self-indulgent.

In a rather bold move, Garbus criticized the Palace for failing to respond to requests for verification regarding the docuseries, implying that their silence spoke volumes about their willingness to engage.

Moreover, Garbus seemed to imply that Harry lacked common sense, while casting Meghan as a social climber.

This perspective raises questions about her motives for continuing to work with the Sussexes, especially considering the docuseries didn’t achieve the success they anticipated.

It’s no secret that many suspect Netflix may have inflated viewership numbers, similar to tactics used by Spotify to portray Meghan’s podcast as a hit.

In a separate discussion, commentators Shannon Felt and Spence weighed in on the fallout from Harry’s memoir.

They argued that his book undermined the goodwill generated by the Netflix docuseries.

Felt remarked that the story had initially garnered sympathy, even from those who typically showed little interest in royal affairs, but the memoir reversed that momentum.

The duo also highlighted the couple’s apparent strategy to cultivate individual brands alongside a joint one.

Felt pointed out that while the book was primarily Harry’s endeavor, Meghan maintained a distinct identity through her podcast promotions.

This division in their branding efforts raises eyebrows about their overall PR strategy.

Ultimately, the Sussexes’ approach to building their public personas seems muddled at best.

With Garbus’s recent comments adding fuel to the fire, it’s clear that the narrative surrounding Harry and Meghan continues to evolve, leaving many to wonder how this will impact their future endeavors.

As the couple navigates the complex world of celebrity and royalty, one thing remains certain: their story is far from over.