Lilibet: Meghan Markle’s Controversial Copyright Move

A recent report has revealed that Meghan Markle trademarked the name Lilibet even before she was expecting a child, allegedly using the Queen's personal nickname to capitalize financially right from the start.

The claims made by Meghan's spokesperson, Omid Scobie, have sparked controversy, with him stating that these revelations are not painting a favorable picture of the late Queen Elizabeth.

According to Scobie, these assertions not only contradict information previously released by the palace in a jointly written biography in 2022 but also present the monarch in a light unfamiliar to the public.

Despite assertions that Meghan and Harry had obtained the Queen's approval to use the name Lilibet, they perceive the ongoing negative publicity surrounding them as part of a continued smear campaign.

While Meghan and Harry's response may seem insignificant, given the lack of concrete evidence that the late Queen endorsed the name, Scobie's history of controversial statements raises doubts about his credibility.

Allegedly, Queen Elizabeth expressed her frustration to palace aides, stating that she only truly owns her name and feels violated by the unauthorized use of her private nickname.

A new book titled “Charles III, New King, New Court, The Inside Story,” authored by Robert Hardman, claims that the Queen was deeply displeased by Meghan and Harry's appropriation of her personal moniker.

Royal Insider Angela Levin, speaking to GB News, described the situation as profoundly saddening, highlighting the emotional significance of the name ‘Lilibet' within the royal family.

Levin's revelation that Meghan had preemptively trademarked the name before her daughter's birth elicited shock from presenter Eamon Holmes.

The act of copyrighting a name with such deep familial connections was deemed disrespectful by Levin, who condemned it as a vindictive move driven by Meghan's discontent with her treatment within the royal family.

The registration of the domain lilibetdiana.com for merchandising purposes before Lilibet's birth was characterized as a callous and profit-driven decision, further tarnishing Meghan's reputation.

The narrative surrounding Meghan's actions suggests a calculated effort to exploit the sentimental value of the Queen's nickname for personal gain, raising questions about her motives and ethical boundaries.

The perceived betrayal of trust and exploitation of a private family symbol for commercial purposes have stirred controversy and cast a shadow over Meghan's intentions.

The strategic maneuvering to secure financial benefits at the expense of familial ties and respect for tradition has drawn criticism and skepticism from various quarters.

The revelation that Meghan drew inspiration for her daughter's name from a poignant moment involving the late Queen and Prince Philip's coffin has added a layer of complexity to the unfolding saga.

The sentimental significance of the name ‘Lilibet' within the royal family underscores the depth of emotion and history associated with it, making Meghan's commercialization of it all the more jarring.

As the controversy unfolds, questions linger about Meghan's true intentions and the implications of her actions on her relationship with the royal family and the public perception of her character.