King Charles: The Royal Titles Dilemma and the Mystery of Harry’s Kids

In the latest royal gossip, King Charles seems to have more pressing matters on his plate than the titles of Prince Harry's children, Archie and Lilibet.

According to royal biographer Andrew Morton, the new monarch is focused on significant issues that overshadow the title debate.

Morton, known for his biography of Princess Diana, recently shared insights with the Daily Beast regarding Charles's priorities.

Morton emphasized that the coronation is at the top of Charles's agenda.

He believes that solidifying the Commonwealth's future and ensuring the royal family's relevance in a diverse society are far more critical than whether Lilibet will officially be a princess or not.

With so much on his mind, it's unlikely that Charles is losing sleep over the titles of his grandchildren.

Adding to the intrigue, royal observer Diana Eppers-Oncora has shed light on why King Charles might be hesitant to bestow titles upon Harry and Meghan's kids.

One of her points raises eyebrows: there's a lack of concrete evidence proving the existence of Archie and Lilibet.

While the royal family likely knows about the children, it's ultimately up to Harry and Meghan to clarify their status.

Eppers-Oncora even speculated about the possibility of a surrogate being involved.

If Harry has a child that isn't biologically Meghan's, that child wouldn't qualify for royal titles under existing laws.

This raises questions about the legitimacy of the claims surrounding the couple's children, leading to skepticism about Lilibet's existence.

The absence of any public appearances or hospital visits from Meghan during her pregnancies has fueled doubts.

Furthermore, the obstetrician who was said to have delivered Lilibet has ceased practicing, which adds another layer of mystery.

Critics point out that if the children were real, Meghan would likely be showcasing them publicly, perhaps even leveraging their royal status for commercial gain.

Eppers-Oncora posed an interesting question: is King Charles waiting for confirmation—maybe even DNA samples—before granting titles?

The speculation hints at a broader concern regarding the legitimacy of Harry and Meghan's claims about their family.

Moreover, there's a suggestion that Meghan and Harry have a super injunction concerning their children, which some believe is not entirely about privacy.

If they truly had children, wouldn't Meghan want to flaunt them?

The absence of such publicity raises further questions.

With the royal family's reputation at stake, the pressure is on Harry to either confirm or deny the existence of his children.

However, doing so could lead to serious ramifications, especially if it contradicts previous statements.

As for Meghan, she seems unlikely to break her silence, especially with the injunction in place.

The mystery surrounding Archie and Lilibet continues to swirl, but the truth may eventually come to light when the injunction expires.

In the meantime, King Charles appears to be prioritizing the future of the monarchy over the ongoing saga of his son's children.

As the royal landscape evolves, the world watches closely, waiting for any sign of clarity in this puzzling royal narrative.